Re: [equinox-dev] Question on org.osgi.framework.system.packages

2009-04-08 Thread Thomas Watson
Hi, Your observation is correct. You either get the packages which the framework determined is available from the VM or you have to provide the complete list in the org.osgi.framework.system.packages yourself. In OSGi R4.2 (implemented in Equinox 3.5) we have added added a new property

[equinox-dev] Validation in Equinox Metatype service

2009-04-08 Thread Jan Stette
Looking at the Equinox implementation of the Metatype service (the version at the head of the trunk in CVS), it appears that the validate() method in AttributionDefinitionImpl only performs validation on strings. Could someone confirm if this is indeed the case, and if so, whether there are any

Re: [equinox-dev] Validation in Equinox Metatype service

2009-04-08 Thread Simon Kaegi
Hi Jan, There are currently no plans for further work in 3.5 however if you open a bug and submit a patch I'd definitely look at it. -Simon | | From: | |

Re: [equinox-dev] Validation in Equinox Metatype service

2009-04-08 Thread Jan Stette
Hi Simon, thanks for your quick reply. I've actually realised that it also validates ranges of numerical attributes if min and max are set. I'll see if the existing validation meets all our needs, and raise a bug report if not. Regards, Jan 2009/4/8 Simon Kaegi simon_ka...@ca.ibm.com Hi Jan,

[equinox-dev] P2 and the transport layer

2009-04-08 Thread J B
Can anyone provide me better details to the current state of the transport layer for P2? We need to support provisioning, but our only available transport layer will be JMS. If the P2 transport layer is based on ECF, I was hoping it might be possible to simply plugin a JMS transport and ride on

Re: [equinox-dev] P2 and the transport layer

2009-04-08 Thread Pascal Rapicault
This was one of the goal of using ECF. I'm happy to see someone realizing this :-) We have not tried this ourselves, but we have been changing the implementation of the http transport without changing the p2 code so this should work (maybe some work needs to be done in ECF around error codes).

Re: [equinox-dev] P2 and the transport layer

2009-04-08 Thread Scott Lewis
Hi All, Yes this is one use case that ECF was introduced to support. Incidently, we do already have JMS-based providers for ECF...although there is a small amount of remaining work to support the filetransfer API. See/join the ecf-dev mailing list here: