Re: [equinox-dev] equinox bundle akin to felix fileinstall

2012-06-15 Thread Thomas Watson
The closest thing is the dropins support in p2, but that is not a good comparison since felix fileinstall is a small single bundle. p2 dropins support is just a part of the whole p2 engine and requires a fair bit of the p2 engine to function. I would be curious to know what exceptions you are

Re: [equinox-dev] equinox bundle akin to felix fileinstall

2012-06-15 Thread Raymond Auge
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 9:36 AM, Thomas Watson tjwat...@us.ibm.com wrote: The closest thing is the dropins support in p2, but that is not a good comparison since felix fileinstall is a small single bundle. p2 dropins support is just a part of the whole p2 engine and requires a fair bit of

Re: [equinox-dev] equinox bundle akin to felix fileinstall

2012-06-15 Thread Neil Bartlett
I think it's more likely that FileInstall is seeing the file and trying to install it while the external process (whatever that might be) is still writing it to the disk. Short of hooking into the OS filesystem events (which would require platform-specific native code), any Fileinstall-like bundle

Re: [equinox-dev] 回复: equinox bundle akin to felix fileinstall

2012-06-15 Thread Raymond Auge
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 10:23 AM, hbdrawn hbdr...@vip.qq.com wrote: i encoutered the same problem before.After checked out the code,i found the *spilth* code in the line of 502(maybe the original code had been modified somewhere,so the line is not correct maybe,but the code below is

[equinox-dev] ?????? ?????? equinox bundle akin to felix fileinstall

2012-06-15 Thread hbdrawn
I think the operation of refreshing for uninstalledBundles and updatedBundles is required, but not for installBundles??And maybe there are some faults just like what Raymond said.-- ??||?? -- -- ??: Raymond