Re: [equinox-dev] Eclipse won't work on JDK9b61 unless default classloader hiearchy is changed

2015-05-12 Thread Daniel Megert
As of http://download.eclipse.org/eclipse/downloads/drops4/I20150511-2130/ Eclipse starts again using the latest JRE 9. Dani From: Tom Schindl tom.schi...@bestsolution.at To: equinox-dev@eclipse.org Date: 07.05.2015 22:23 Subject:Re: [equinox-dev] Eclipse won't work on

Re: [equinox-dev] Bundles remaining in life cyle Starting.

2015-05-12 Thread Neil Bartlett
No sorry this is not right. Alex and Tom’s answer was correct. Please refer to section 4.4.6.2 of the OSGi Core R6 specification for details of the Lazy Activation Policy and its impact on bundle lifecycle. Unsatisfied imports such as in your example would cause a failure of resolution,

Re: [equinox-dev] Bundles remaining in life cyle Starting.

2015-05-12 Thread Pablo Beltran
Hmm, I would say they remain on such state due a missing class (or any other problem while loading B in memory) For instance, plugin A imports class B which imports class C. If C is not available A will remain in the Starting state for ever. El 12/5/2015 11:49, Lars Vogel lars.vo...@vogella.com

Re: [equinox-dev] Bundles remaining in life cyle Starting.

2015-05-12 Thread Pablo Beltran
Surely the other answer was right and I confused both states. Thanks for the clarification and sorry for my bad input :(. 2015-05-12 12:36 GMT+02:00 Neil Bartlett njbartl...@gmail.com: No sorry this is not right. Alex and Tom’s answer was correct. Please refer to section 4.4.6.2 of the OSGi

Re: [equinox-dev] Bundles remaining in life cyle Starting.

2015-05-12 Thread Lars Vogel
Thanks Alex and Tom for the clarification. Best regards, Lars On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 3:14 PM, Thomas Watson tjwat...@us.ibm.com wrote: Alex is correct. Things in the STARTING state are waiting to be lazily activated on first class define. Tom -equinox-dev-boun...@eclipse.org wrote: