We will bring this topic up for discussion at next week's architecture
call. Personally I want to use option #2 but if we are the only team
doing this then it will look pretty inconsistent with the rest of the
eclipse teams.
Tom
BJ Hargrave/Austin/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL
i thought we were all already doing #2...
Jeff
Thomas Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
07/11/2007 01:42 PM
Please respond to
Equinox development mailing list equinox-dev@eclipse.org
To
equinox-dev@eclipse.org
cc
Subject
[equinox-dev] What to do with 3.3.1 candidate bugs
Each major release the same thing happens. We start fixing bugs in HEAD
for the next major release but find a few fixes that we would like to also
release into a maintenance release. Then we have to decide what to do
with the status of the original bug report which was used to release the
Given bugzilla provides a clone this bug link, I think option #2 is the
best choice.
--
BJ Hargrave
Senior Technical Staff Member, IBM
OSGi Fellow and CTO of the OSGi Alliance
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
office: +1 386 848 1781
mobile: +1 386 848 3788
Thomas Watson/Austin/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
2)
Thomas Watson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
com
