mailing list
Subject: Re: [equinox-dev] Eclipse Startup Performance
Hi Martin,
There are no plans as of now to work on a performance issue at the framework
level. I'm not saying I would not work on a performance issue, just that I am
unaware of a performance issue in the framework
Right, resolution got slower, but that is not related to warm starts from
cache which is what Martin measured IIUC.
Tom
From: Tom Schindl
To: Equinox development mailing list
Date: 03/26/2015 09:18 AM
Subject:Re: [equinox-dev] Eclipse Startup Performance
Sent by
ions are virtually
> identical so my initial guess is we are loading more code to start Eclipse.
>
> Tom
>
>
>
>
>
> From:"Oberhuber, Martin"
> To:"equinox-dev@eclipse.org" ,
> "platform-ui-...@eclipse.org"
&g
e Luna and Mars framework implementations are virtually
identical so my initial guess is we are loading more code to start
Eclipse.
Tom
From: "Oberhuber, Martin"
To: "equinox-dev@eclipse.org" ,
"platform-ui-...@eclipse.org"
Date: 03/26/2015 08:40 AM
Hello Equinox and Platform/UI committers,
We recently measured startup performance of our IDE based on Eclipse. We
measured 4 milestones:
- 20140325 (based on Kepler SR2),
- 20141014 (based on Luna SR1),
- 20150224 (based on Luna SR2)
- 20150224+mars (based
