Re: [equinox-dev] equinox console optionality of available commands

2015-03-26 Thread Thomas Watson
:14 PM Subject:Re: [equinox-dev] equinox console optionality of available commands Sent by:equinox-dev-boun...@eclipse.org On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 3:01 PM, Thomas Watson wrote: I understand the desire to remove exit since that does a System.exit. But shutdown and close just

Re: [equinox-dev] equinox console optionality of available commands

2015-03-26 Thread Raymond Auge
commands (where the default is to leave everything published like now)? - Ray > > Tom > > > > > > From:Raymond Auge > To:Equinox development mailing list > Date: 03/26/2015 01:35 PM > Subject:[equinox-dev] equinox console o

Re: [equinox-dev] equinox console optionality of available commands

2015-03-26 Thread Thomas Watson
down and close. BTW, I am fine with removing shutdown and close altogether since they are the same as 'stop 0' really. Tom From: Raymond Auge To: Equinox development mailing list Date: 03/26/2015 01:35 PM Subject: [equinox-dev] equinox console optionality

[equinox-dev] equinox console optionality of available commands

2015-03-26 Thread Raymond Auge
Would people object to a change in equinox.console which would optionally allow for specific commands not to be published? For instance, when running equinox embedded we're controlling the lifecycle of the framework along with the lifecycle of the embedding application. I would like to not expose