Hi Matt,
Thanks for comments. A couple of follow ups.
Matt Flaherty wrote:
Hmmm... Looks like CDC/Foundation does not include the
javax.security.auth.* packages. I'm not sure if a JAAS implementation
could be dropped on top of it, but I wouldn't be surprised if it
could. JAAS is pretty
I updated the following ECF projects to use the Equinox code
conventions. I also updated each project to format java files when saving.
org.eclipse.ecf
org.eclipse.ecf.core.identity
org.eclipse.ecf.filetransfer
org.eclipse.ecf.provider.filetransfer
Since prov is currently using an old tag of
Hi Jeff,
Jeff McAffer wrote:
Thanks to Stefan we have been introducing the notion of
ProcessingSteps to munge the content as it is downloaded from an
artifact repository. This allows for things like inline MD5 digest
checking, unpack200 processing, delta merging, signature checking, ...
.
extension registry?, others?).
Scott
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Tuesday 09 October 2007 04:28, Scott Lewis wrote:
Is there any existing LogService implementation that just prints to
System.out/System.err...that is in a bundle present for *all* Equinox
impls (not just Eclipse)?
Equinox
Hi Folks,
Some questions: I thought I understood (from Equinox Summit) that the
recently approved minimum EE for Equinox 3.4 (Ganymede) was CDC
1.1/Foundation 1.1.
I see from looking at the equinox JAAS integration bundles (e.g.
org.eclipse.equinox.security.auth) that the runtime
Is there any example and/or test code for
http://wiki.eclipse.org/Adaptor_Hooks
?
Thanksinadvance,
Scott
___
equinox-dev mailing list
equinox-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev
IMetadataRepositoryManager or IArtifactRepositoryManager. Hope that
helps get you started...
John
*Scott Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED]*
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
02/05/2008 12:08 PM
Please respond to
Equinox development mailing list equinox-dev@eclipse.org
To
Equinox development mailing
Hi Jeff,
Jeff McAffer wrote:
Unless it has changed since I messed with it, that
FileServerApplication was some hacky attempt at putting an HTTP server
on front of some repos. It may be an ok starting point but i'd not
put too much weight on it. Perhaps we should just have one thing that
Jeff McAffer wrote:
There currently is no support for known repositories. At least not
that I know of. :-)
I created enhancement request
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=218534
for this.
___
equinox-dev mailing list
will have to comment on the feasibility of getting this in. Having
said that, we can always have another route that is less well
integrated and comes from the incubator at the beginning and then gets
integrated over time.
ok.
Scott
Jeff
Scott Lewis wrote:
Hi Jeff,
Jeff McAffer wrote
Hi Alessandro,
Alessandro Mottadelli wrote:
Scott,
thanks for the pointer and info.
To implement the described use case (all clients in the lan need to
pull something from the wan) I was thinking to something different
(maybe simpler?) than mirroring.
My first idea was a sort of cooperative
Pascal Rapicault wrote:
Another approach could consist in having a repo that uses bit torrent has
its underlying transport.
Good point :). ECF does have a bittorrent provider as well:
CVS
/cvsroot/technology/org.eclipse.ecf/providers/org.eclipse.ecf.provider.bittorrent
which depends upon
Howday p2'ers,
The M6 release of Eclipse/p2 seems to have used a relatively old
integration build of the 4 ECF bundles (i.e. they have qualifier
v20080317-0809 rather than the 20080324 integration build as I expected
from this bug:
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=219499
This
this.
From: Scott Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED
on the server during the build
http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/platform-releng-dev/msg11579.html
In case of a rebuild we will be looking into addressing this.
From: Scott Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Equinox development mailing list equinox
Hi Pascal and all,
Some additional participation opportunities:
- Multi-threaded downloads using ECF
- User interface for configuring/pausing/resuming/managing downloads
- Use/testing of bittorrent for downloads (and/or other protocols)
- Integration/UI of dynamic repository discovery, both in
Hi Folks,
Sorry, I realize I may have stepped on (Susan's) toes WRT the UI items
below.
Susan can comment (if she wants) on whether participation on the below
fits in with her/others plans in those areas.
Scott
Scott Lewis wrote:
Hi Pascal and all,
Some additional participation
Hi Pascal,
Pascal Rapicault wrote:
- Multi-threaded downloads using ECF
What do you have in mind here that is different from what we already
have in today?
We currently are not using multiple threads to download different
sections of a single (large) file...e.g. thread 1:
Hi Jeff,
Jeff McAffer wrote:
While we are all loving each other I feel obliged to say that the focus of
this call to action was (I believe) helping p2 *ship in 3.4* with a
reasonable function level.
It wasn't apparent to me that the original participation solicitation
was scoped to be
Hey all,
In 3.4M6a, I just updated to the latest of all the projects in
org.eclipse.equinox.p2.releng/projectSet.psf
I'm getting a compile error in
org.eclipse.equinox.p2.reconciler.dropins/Activator:244:
...
Location eclipseHome = (Location)
ServiceHelper.getService(getContext(),
To address https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=224196
ECF included two new ssl fragments in it's 4/21/2008 integration build
and made them available as described here
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=219499#c37
It seems that although the 4/21 build of the 4 regular ECF
With the recent changes/additions for patch handling, will p2 now allow
the update/patch of platform plugins (including, for example, ECF6)?
Reason I ask...ECF currently has to create separate builds (and ask
people to use different update sites) for ECF-on-eclipse 3.3-3.4M5, and
Hi Olivier,
This utility method was added as part of a bug fix to one of our
provider bundles, and the committer didn't initially realize that the 6
ECF bundles going into the platform integration build were now under API
freeze.
When he realized that this method was added to a bundle under
Hi Olivier,
Olivier Thomann wrote:
Hi Scott,
This didn't cause any work for anybody except the build machine :-). The
check is done during each build. It was easy to detect it without any
extra work.
That's nice to know...maybe releng would be willing to share the scripts
to run the
Hi Equinoxers,
ECF has a discovery provider that is based upon SLP (Service Locator
Protocol...RFC 2608). The provider plugin depends upon/uses the java
implementation of SLP called jSLP [1], originally developed by Jan
Rellermeyer, who is now an ECF committer and has contributed jSLP to
p2.
John
*Scott Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED]*
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
05/14/2008 01:15 PM
Please respond to
Equinox development mailing list equinox-dev@eclipse.org
To
Equinox development mailing list equinox-dev@eclipse.org
cc
Subject
[equinox-dev] [sec] use
FYI,
There's some interesting work just beginning on remote provisioning
using p2 and ECF remote services described here:
http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/ecf-dev/msg01570.html
Scott
___
equinox-dev mailing list
equinox-dev@eclipse.org
My apologies...I forgot to notify this list. Thanks PaScaL for sending.
Scott
Pascal Rapicault wrote:
Last week, Scott announced on the ECF mailing list that development
leading to ECF 2.0 will be done in a branch called Release_2_0.
Therefore, if you have ECF loaded in your workspace,
I agree that URIs would be desirable over URLs.
One thing to point out though...there is no URI class in the CDC
1.0/Foundation 1.0 EE. That's the primary reason that the ECF
filetransfer IFileIDFactory does not have a URI-based file id creation
(it does have URL-based creation, of course),
Hi Fredrik,
Fredrik Alströmer wrote:
stuff deleted
As a hypothetical use-case you could probably also take remote
invocation, if you have it as an OSGi service (for example) instead,
there's nothing keeping the framework from giving you a
proxy-implemenation doing RMI calls, which might be
Hi Folks,
I was at Google yesterday, and a person there was having troubles with
p2 because they were trying to do plugin installs with Eclipse p2 on a
read only filesystem. I haven't tried this myself, so I may not have
all the details described correctly, but are there any known issues
Hi Henrik,
Really Cool Stuff. I'm examining/trying it now.
One comment I wanted to make on this list...you have a number of good
questions about the p2 use of Namespaces and IDs on the wiki page (e.g.
can new namespaces be added, what are constraints on IDs, etc).
I just wanted to remark
Scott Lewis wrote:
stuff deleted
and extend it heavily...to represent service ids, user ids, group ids,
file ids, etc. It has minimal requirements (none other than CDC
1.0/Foundation 1.0).
Sorry, I should have been clearer about this. It does also have a dep
on org.eclipse.equinox.common
I'm trying to setup an Equinox server and run startApp from within the
console.
I'm successfully starting org.eclipse.equinox.app bundle upon framework
start, and so see the application commands in the console of the OSGi
server.
But when I give the startApp command in console, the
Hi Thomas,
Thanks for the info...this does the job.
One other question: Is there a way to specify these application
properties from inside the console 'startApp'?
Scott
___
equinox-dev mailing list
equinox-dev@eclipse.org
/cardinality options you want.
You can open an enhancement bug if you want to investigate overriding
properties of an applications extension when launching an application.
Tom
Inactive hide details for Scott Lewis ---08/27/2008 04:05:03 PM---Hi
Thomas,Scott Lewis ---08/27/2008 04:05:03 PM---Hi Thomas
H Tom,
Thanks for the responses. Follow up inline below.
Scott
Thomas Watson wrote:
Comments in line below.
Tom
Scott Lewis wrote
ECF is looking to implement OSGi 4.2 RFC 119 in the Galileo/ECF 3.0
release:
This is great news.
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=249240
On this E4 enhancement request:
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=253777
there has been a long and fruitful discussion about supporting
asynchronous programming (for E4 as well as other projects including
ECF, p2, DSDP) by adding the concept of a 'future' to Equinox. Various
Hi Thomas,
Thomas Watson wrote:
How big is the code? I got the impression that is is not going to be
that big (perhaps 20k or less)?
The current class files are ~15k compressed jar (good guess Tom).
Scott
___
equinox-dev mailing list
.
Scott
Thomas Watson wrote:
comments in-line.
Tom
Scott Lewis wrote:
Hi all,
Although provisional API (for 1.5 years) seems a bit conservative...and
it will cause ECF/other potential clients of the API difficulties over
this time (i.e. we would like to have our ECF 3.0/Galileo release
Hi Thomas,
As it turns out, the RFC 119 spec removed SERVICE_TYPE usage some time
ago, so we (ECF) didn't even have a chance to reference it in our impl.
...so we're +1 on immediate removal.
Scott
Thomas Watson wrote:
Hello fellow Equinox team. In the past Equinox was under the Eclipse
Hi All,
Yes this is one use case that ECF was introduced to support.
Incidently, we do already have JMS-based providers for ECF...although
there is a small amount of remaining work to support the filetransfer API.
See/join the ecf-dev mailing list here:
Hi JB,
J B wrote:
stuff deleted
I was able to get the P2 console started, but haven't been able to
figure out how to provision a bundle using yet. Anyone have
experience with doing that?
Yes. The main things to do:
1) Create a 'group iu' in your repository. This can easily be
Question about the SCRManager class in the org.eclipse.equinox.ds
declarative services implementation:
Is there any way to get at the SCRManager instance programmatically?
That is, there is already a command provider that allows console access
to the SCRManager (and the ServiceComponents,
For those interested, I've created an enhancement request easier
servletbridge-based equinox servers, with p2 bundles included.
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=275762
I've attached a contribution that is a feature and product-definition
for creating such a server/servers. Any
be best mandated by the DS spec so that
it could be used independently of any framework or SCR implementation.
I have started writing an RFP for this already but have not had a lot
of time to work on it.
Neil
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 8:17 AM, Stoyan Boshev s.bos...@prosyst.com wrote:
Scott Lewis
Hi Ali,
The Eclipse Communication Framework [1] project has a provider
architecture, allowing the use of arbitrary protocols to implement
common APIs.
Some years ago, one of our committers (Pierre Henry-Perret) did some
work to implement a jxta provider [2]. This work was not
Hi Rajeev, Simon, Bryan,
FYI, there is already quite a lot of REST support in the Eclipse
Communication Framework (ECF) project, which is part of Eclipse RT along
with Equinox. Below are some relevant links to the existing work here.
One of the things that we *haven't* completed/done with
/03/2010 18:55, Scott Lewis a écrit :
Hi Rajeev, Simon, Bryan,
FYI, there is already quite a lot of REST support in the Eclipse
Communication Framework (ECF) project, which is part of Eclipse RT along
with Equinox. Below are some relevant links to the existing work here.
One of the things that we
.
Le 29/03/2010 19:33, Scott Lewis a écrit :
Hi Jerome,
Jerome Louvel wrote:
Hi Scott, Rajeev and all,
Thanks for your interest Rajeev in this GSoC project.
Scott, it seems that the integration of Restlet with ECF could give
you with fully-featured server-side REST support. This would also
Hi Rob,
Thanks for the comments. A couple of reactions inline below:
Rob Heittman wrote:
Restlet is already fairly far down the road of bundleization (sounds
German). The project delivers many bundles which provide different
extension capabilities and compatibilities, and at least at the
Hi Rob,
Rob Heittman wrote:
Inline:
On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 6:01 PM, Scott Lewis sle...@composent.com
mailto:sle...@composent.com wrote:
My only comment about discovery is that ECF also has a discovery
API (org.eclipse.ecf.discovery) ...
[snip]
The OSGi remote services
Hi Jens,
Jens Lauterbach wrote:
stuff deleted
So I'm curious about the other specs not listed on this page:
• UPnP Device Service
• Remote Services
The Eclipse Communication Framework (3.2) project (part of EclipseRT,
but not Equinox project specifically) fully
Sorry...here are the refs:
[1] http://eclipseecf.blogspot.com/2010/02/ecf-32-now-available.html
[2]
http://eclipseecf.blogspot.com/2010/01/osgi-remote-services-from-ecf.html
Scott Lewis wrote:
Hi Jens,
Jens Lauterbach wrote:
stuff deleted
So I'm curious about the other specs not listed
Hi Folks,
The org.eclipse.equinox.concurrent bundle has a package in it:
org.eclipse.equinox.concurrent.future that is exported, but is currently
marked
x-internal:=true since it's been considered provisional since being
introduce Jan 2009. I would like to consider removing x-internal=true
will not be automatically breaking clients.
Only if we find something that must change will clients be broken when
it becomes API.
Tom
Inactive hide details for Scott Lewis ---04/13/2010 09:33:38 PM---Hi
Folks,Scott Lewis ---04/13/2010 09:33:38 PM---Hi Folks,
From:
Scott Lewis sle...@composent.com
Hi,
Would someone be able to point me at docs on the context classloader
support specifics in Equinox?
Thanks,
Scott
___
equinox-dev mailing list
equinox-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev
Hi Folks,
Is there a threadpool impl available in Equinox somewhere?
(non-internal packages of course).
Thanks,
Scott
___
equinox-dev mailing list
equinox-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev
This is a request to have the org.eclipse.equinox.concurrent API
reviewed, accentuated (if desired...e.g. integration with jobs API), and
ultimately graduated (from provisional) for ultimate inclusion in
Equinox 3.7.
Please see the attachment on this bug:
Thomas,
Although I was unable to attend this call and probably won't be able to
attend future calls at the chosen time/day, I would like to request a
review as per my mailing list posting below. I would like to make sure
this request is not lost in the usual shuffle.
Thanks,
Scott
Greetings,
As planned, the ECF project is approaching completion of an ECF-based
implementation of the remote service admin OSGi 4.2 specification [1].
For those unfamiliar, the remote service admin spec is part of the OSGi
enterprise spec. As appropriate for our project scope, our
through the tracing tab on the Eclipse launch
configuration. Not sure if these trace options would provide the
information you are looking for though.
Tom
Scott Lewis ---05/11/2011 01:22:29 PM---I
believe there are some
On 5/11/2011 2:04 PM, Neil Bartlett wrote:
Scott,
Is this what you're looking for?
http://wiki.eclipse.org/Equinox/RuntimeOptions
Yes...exactly. Thanks kindly Neil and Thomas.
Scott
___
equinox-dev mailing list
equinox-dev@eclipse.org
Hi,
ECF has consumers that use our OSGi remote services implementation in
client-server use cases. Some of these also use other framework impls
(e.g. felix) for the remote service host and/or consumer.
As a plugin to Eclipse, we use Bundle-ActivationPolicy: lazy for
many/most of our
Hi Richard,
On 3/13/2012 11:58 AM, Richard S. Hall wrote:
stuff deleted
However, I can talk about general OSGi policy: If your bundle is
expected to provide functionality to client bundles and client bundles
can reasonably expect to obtain (or witness or whatever) your provided
On 7/3/2012 10:48 AM, BJ Hargrave wrote:
Several of the OSGi spec implementations in Equinox Juno are used as
RI for OSGi Compendium 4.3: DS, Metatype, Coordinator, Initial
Provisioning, Event Admin, Wire Admin. So all those implementations
are at the Compendium 4.3 level.
I don't know the
Hello,
Is there documentation on Equinox security services like
org.eclipse.osgi.service.security.TrustEngine service...and
implementation? I looked in the Equinox Security area [1], but didn't
find a lot of service/API docs. Is/are there examples of using the
TrustEngine service(s)?
Greetings,
We/ECF uses Equinox event for our implementation of the Remote Service
Admin specification. One of our consumers has been using ECF remote
services/RSA, Equinox, DS and their own code, and has experienced a
problem that we are attempting to diagnose.
See the full description on
a thread dump for us to look at.
Tom
Scott Lewis
---01/17/2013 11:51:11 AM---Greetings, We/ECF uses Equinox
event for our implementation of the Remote Service
From: Scott Lewis
sle...@composent.com
ECF is another option for OSGi remote services (and Remote Service
Admin). RS/RSA was formerly known as DOSGI.
http://wiki.eclipse.org/ECF#OSGi_Remote_Services
ECF has a provider architecture for remote services [1]...which allows
the use of a variety of existing transportsincluding
Hi Folks,
A couple of questions about simpleconfigurator (and simpleconfigurator
manipulator):
1) I see from a casual look at the dependencies that it only imports
org.osgi packages...does this mean that SC/SCM can run on other
frameworks (e.g. Felix)?
2) I assume that simple configurator
Scott
Lewis ---07/23/2013 03:34:37 PM---Hi Folks, A couple of
questions about
simpleconfigurator (and simpleconfigurator
From: Scott Lewis
sle...@composent.com
To: Equinox development
mailing list
equinox-dev
ECF is restructuring our features so that our bundles can more easily be
installed in non-Eclipse runtime environments [1]. We also would like
to continue to produce distributions that can run on Felix and/or other
frameworks while providing as much of our own functionality as
On 12/11/2013 1:35 PM, Thomas Watson wrote:
From: Scott Lewis sle...@composent.com
Hi Tom,
On 12/11/2013 5:47 AM, Thomas Watson wrote:
We may be able to put org.eclipse.osgi.service.security package in
supplemental, but would it be possible to have others supply a
different fragment
Hi,
I'm interested in whether there are any desires and/or plans for Equinox
to implement the EEG Subsystem Spec (chap 134) in Luna or post
timeframe? I went to the Equinox plan [1] and something seems to be
wrong with accessing the page right now so I couldn't see whether it's
in the
/rt.equinox/releases/4.4.0
Scott Lewis
---12/19/2013 12:38:45 PM---Hi, I'm interested in whether
there are any desires and/or plans for Equinox
From: Scott Lewis
sle...@composent.com
To: Equinox development mailing list
Hi Gunnar,
On 3/15/2014 6:49 AM, Gunnar Wagenknecht wrote:
On 2014-03-07 16:58:17 +, sle...@composent.com said:
3) Both orgs are already using Jetty...and are looking to continue this
I believe, the approaches are totally different from a technical point
of view.
Currently...perhaps.
Hi,
I assume that since the current Equinox HttpService impl is provided by
Jetty that some version of Jetty will be used for Equinox Luna. If
that's right, what version of Jetty will be used?
Thanks,
Scott
___
equinox-dev mailing list
with a quick point release that has a critical fix in it,
or something. But will stay on 8.x stream, if that's more to the point?
HTH
From: Scott Lewis sle...@composent.com
To: Equinox development mailing list equinox-dev@eclipse.org,
Date: 04/17/2014 05:45 PM
Subject: [equinox-dev] Jetty
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=376950
On 6/4/2014 7:04 PM, Raymond Auge wrote:
Does anyone know if PDE supports DS annotations?
It seems not in Kepler, but I'm holding out hope until I hear no from
you all.
--
*Raymond Augé*
http://www.liferay.com/web/raymond.auge/profile
We/ECF would like to be able to run some junit plugin tests (junit 3 at
least, 4 if possible) with the java security manager running in the target.
Has anyone previously created/got the .java.security policy and
appropriate permission.perms that would allow this to happen? I fussed
with
On 9/18/2014 10:04 AM, Thomas Watson wrote:
We are looking to move up the Jetty 9 for Equinox. But from the
perspective of the http service impl in Equinox it is expected to work
across multiple container implementations and Servlet specification
levels. Jetty 9 is attractive for several
On 2/19/2015 5:26 PM, BJ Hargrave wrote:
See http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/equinox-dev/msg08088.html
Thanks. I can't seem to find the SCR version at felix.apache.org that
supports RFC190. Would you please point me in the right direction there?
And given Thomas' plans for Mars
On 9/18/2014 10:04 AM, Thomas Watson wrote:
We are looking to move up the Jetty 9 for Equinox. But from the
perspective of the http service impl in Equinox it is expected to work
across multiple container implementations and Servlet specification
levels. Jetty 9 is attractive for several
Ray and Thomas,
Regarding the OSGi R6 httpservice impl in equinox: Are all the same
equinox bundles required (any new or removed)? Are there any
equinox-specific examples, tests, or docs?
Thanksinadvance,
Scott
___
equinox-dev mailing list
Schneider ch...@die-schneider.net
mailto:ch...@die-schneider.net a écrit :
I am currently helping Scott Lewis to bring ECF to Apache Karaf.
Our biggest problem with this is that ECF needs a bunch of equinox
bundles that are not available in maven central.
See this
http://download.eclipse.org/rt/ecf
On 7/20/2015 5:39 AM, Thomas Watson wrote:
I think it would be great if we could make this happen for all of
Equinox.
BTW jobs is not part of Equinox, it is part of the Eclipse project.
It appears to be in the Equinox Mars SDK...would it be possible to
include it in what's being discussed?
On 7/20/2015 1:49 PM, Thomas Watson wrote:
The Equinox SDK includes several bundles that are not actually
developed as part of the Equinox project. I'm not sure I want to have
Equinox publish other Eclipse project's bundles. I would like to
start with publishing only the Equinox bits that
Equinox implements the osgi application service
(org.osgi.service.application) via this bundle:
org.eclipse.equinox.app
This bundle has compile-time dependencies on both the equinox service
registry (org.eclipse.equinox.registry), and PackageAdmin which for some
environments are a
towards R7
is being done in a branch (twatson/osgiR7). Again this is not planned
to be included in Oxygen because the specification likely will not
complete in time. We could consider it for Oxygen.1 though.
Tom
From: Scott Lewis <sle...@composent.com>
To: equinox-dev@eclipse.org
Da
Hi,
I thought I remembered that Equinox/Eclipse was going with the replacing
the SCR impl that it's currently using with the Felix SCR implementation
sometime during the Oxygen release cycle. Is that still right? If
so, when is it planned to happen? And one final question: I assume
On 11/15/2016 6:44 PM, Pascal Rapicault wrote:
Specifically:
- Is it possible to publish the bundle generic
capabilities/requirements to the p2 repository?
Yes this should be possible. The underlying p2 capability /
requirement model is really extensible and the current limitation is
Hi Peter,
FWIW, ECF depends upon and distributes
org.osgi.service.remoteserviceadmin.* as part of ECF's RSA impl. We use
a piggy back CQ:
https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8527
Not that I'm recommending this for metatype annotation classes. Seems to
me it would be better
Hi,
I want to verify: org.osgi.util.promise (via org.eclipse.osgi.util)
doesn't seem to be in Eclipse Neon, but is available in Oxygen+.
Is that right?
Scott
___
equinox-dev mailing list
equinox-dev@eclipse.org
To change your delivery options,
Scott Lewis voted:
+1
Welcome
Voting summary: http://portal.eclipse.org/
___
equinox-dev mailing list
equinox-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev
95 matches
Mail list logo