https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1074886
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083637
--- Comment #2 from Lon Hohberger l...@redhat.com ---
(Obviously comment #1 is not the subject of this bugzilla :) )
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083637
Lon Hohberger l...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083637
--- Comment #5 from Lon Hohberger l...@redhat.com ---
Created attachment 881910
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=881910action=edit
Example
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083637
--- Comment #6 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Lon Hohberger from comment #4)
There are two separate optimizations - one is for erlang, which looks like
bug 784693 - the other is for rabbitmq-server's .spec file -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083637
--- Comment #7 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com ---
The patch in comment 5 looks reasonable. Peter what do you think
about [me or you] adding this? So far I've only made a few quite
conservative changes to the rabbitmq-server
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083637
--- Comment #8 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Richard W.M. Jones from comment #7)
The patch in comment 5 looks reasonable. Peter what do you think
about [me or you] adding this? So far I've only made a few quite
