Hi,
I've been discussing with Jakob about what problems we face and what we
should do next and I think it's better to have it open and available to
everyone, not the least because someone might point out our blind spots.
# Short background
We have discovered that it is more and more difficult fo
# Step 1: project structure
By project structure (or layout) I mean the places where files are located
in a project. I suggest to use the code_path as the base for defining the
project structure, extended so that it can refer to source code too, not
only beam code (suggested name to avoid confusio
Do we need both ErlProjectInfo and ErlProjectLayout? In any case, I propose
that they are internal to the core plugin, and that all external exposure of
the project is made through IErlProject.
/Jakob
2011/2/8 Vlad Dumitrescu
> # Step 1: project structure
>
> By project structure (or layout) I
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 11:47, Jakob Cederlund wrote:
> Do we need both ErlProjectInfo and ErlProjectLayout? In any case, I propose
> that they are internal to the core plugin, and that all external exposure of
> the project is made through IErlProject.
>
ErlProjectInfo contains more information
On 2011-02-08, at 7:30, Vlad Dumitrescu wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 11:47, Jakob Cederlund wrote:
> Do we need both ErlProjectInfo and ErlProjectLayout? In any case, I propose
> that they are internal to the core plugin, and that all external exposure of
> the project is made through IErlP
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 14:05, Alain O'Dea wrote:
> On 2011-02-08, at 7:30, Vlad Dumitrescu wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 11:47, Jakob Cederlund <
> jako...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Do we need both ErlProjectInfo and ErlProjectLayout? In any case, I
>> propose that they are internal to the cor
On 2011-02-08, at 9:45, Vlad Dumitrescu wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 14:05, Alain O'Dea wrote:
> On 2011-02-08, at 7:30, Vlad Dumitrescu wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 11:47, Jakob Cederlund wrote:
>> Do we need both ErlProjectInfo and ErlProjectLayout? In any case, I propose
>>
