I placed guards and trademarks on the agenda for this month's meeting. They're
intentionally a relatively bare-bones and secure mechanism:
http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=strawman:guards
http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=strawman:trademarks
These partially rely on a mechanism for
I read Brendan's recent article
http://brendaneich.com/2011/05/my-jsconf-us-presentation/
He asked for community members to make their feelings known and the
es-discuss list as one of the places to do it.
In his article, Brendan shows a slide with the following content
Le 07/05/2011 02:04, Peter Michaux a écrit :
I'd like to ask when is function too long? I never type it thanks to
my text editor's features so I know it is not too long for developers
with a good editor.
What editor are you using? I have always been disappointed in my
experience with IDEs and
On May 6, 2011, at 5:04 PM, Peter Michaux wrote:
The only possible category is be a better language but the arrow
syntax won't make JavaScript a better language for complex
applications or libraries in comparison to any other kind of
JavaScript code.
Usability is always on the top three
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 6:39 PM, Brendan Eich bren...@mozilla.com wrote:
But again, you can use 14 characters if you want.
The problem is that the author of the code that I'm reading may have
used the arrow syntax and then I'm stuck reading it.
This is shorthand, and only shorthand. And
On May 7, 2011, at 12:42 AM, Peter Michaux wrote:
Yes and readability counts. JavaScript's function syntax is already
*highly* usable and readable.
Many people, including me, would disagree. On matters of taste, I'd want the
committee to listen to all interested parties and try to pick the
6 matches
Mail list logo
