Re: Mootools and String.prototype.contains

2012-10-13 Thread David Bruant
2012/10/12 Geoffrey Sneddon gsned...@opera.com On 12/10/12 14:50, David Bruant wrote: I was looking at Bugzilla and came across two bugs [1] [2] related to Mootools-based (only Mootools 1.2-) websites being broken by the inclusion of String.prototype.contains in SpiderMonkey. I don't think

Public communication channels (was: Mootools and String.prototype.contains)

2012-10-13 Thread David Bruant
2012/10/12 Alex Russell slightly...@google.com I feel like there's as PSA we should write over on webplatform.org for library authors about how to not be future hostile. Some context for those who wouldn't have followed. The W3C, major (western?) browser makers, Nokia, Facebook, HP, Adobe

Re: Public communication channels (was: Mootools and String.prototype.contains)

2012-10-13 Thread Alex Russell
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 12:34 PM, David Bruant bruan...@gmail.com wrote: 2012/10/12 Alex Russell slightly...@google.com I feel like there's as PSA we should write over on webplatform.org for library authors about how to not be future hostile. Some context for those who wouldn't have

Re: Public communication channels (was: Mootools and String.prototype.contains)

2012-10-13 Thread David Bruant
2012/10/13 Alex Russell slightly...@google.com On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 12:34 PM, David Bruant bruan...@gmail.com wrote: Since it's in such an early stage and it's not really well-known and well-established, is webplatform.org the right place to do a PSA as you suggest? Do you have a