Re: Label statement moveable

Sorry, I forgot the smiley on my post. Bob -- Forwarded message -- >> > From: Brendan Eich > To: Bob Myers > Cc: es-discuss@mozilla.org > Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 16:45:38 -0700 > Subject: Re: Label statement moveable > Bob Myers wrote: > >> Can we also get goto statements? >> > >

Re: Label statement moveable

Bob Myers wrote: Can we also get goto statements? No, although an out-of-shipping-date Opera engine supported them. Also, if we going to do gotos, then please implement computed GOTO. FORTRAN has had that already for like 50 years. Sorry, JS is not Fortran. Goto considered harmful, Dijkstra

Re: Sharing module's environment (i.e., Module Record) along multiple imports

On May 21, 2015, at 2:48 PM, Park, Daejun wrote: > [It might be already discussed, but I couldn't find it.] > > According to my understanding, the spec does not specify the behavior of > sharing module's environment (more specifically Module Record) along multiple > imports, but leaves it as i

Sharing module's environment (i.e., Module Record) along multiple imports

[It might be already discussed, but I couldn't find it.] According to my understanding, the spec does not specify the behavior of sharing module's environment (more specifically Module Record) along multiple imports, but leaves it as implementation-dependent. If it is true, what is the rational

Re: Re: Label statement moveable

Can we also get goto statements? Also, if we going to do gotos, then please implement computed GOTO. FORTRAN has had that already for like 50 years. Bob -- Forwarded message -- > From: "Sébastien Doeraene" > To: Emanuel Allen > Cc: "es-discuss@mozilla.org" > Date: Wed, 20 May

Re: Look-behind proposal

I revised my proposal for lookbehinds: http://www.akenotsuki.com/misc/srell/lookbehind_proposal.html I rewrote the paragraphs about how to count Atoms in Disjunction, to clarify that the recursive call is used for nested Disjunctions. Regards, Nozomu