On 31 July 2015 at 20:09, Samuel Hapák samuel.ha...@vacuumapps.com wrote:
So, do you still have objections against this proposal? Could we summarize
them?
@Andreas, do you still think that there is category error involved?
If you want to overload existing object pattern syntax, then yes,
+1 for line delimited JSON. It would be good to switch all users of
json-seq over to it and to deprecate json-seq. Perhaps an RFC would help.
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 11:53 PM, Bruno Jouhier bjouh...@gmail.com wrote:
RFC 7464 has a different format (0x1E at beginning of every record) and a
RFC 7464 has a different format (0x1E at beginning of every record) and a
different media type (application/json-seq vs application/x-ldjson) than
line delimited JSON (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Line_Delimited_JSON).
The 0x1E at the beginning of every record makes it hard to edit these
files.
Are there some example use-cases where being able to `.ignore` is preferable
to having the promise reject?
The purpose of .ignore() is to let promises show disinterest, by disinterest, i
mean the situation that whatever happens to that promise, it shouldn't be
observable to the callbacks.
Glen, sorry if this has been covered in other discussions, but it's not
clear to me so I wanted to ask. Are there some example use-cases where
being able to `.ignore` is preferable to having the promise reject? Promise
chains are about defining flows of data and I can't really see a case where
On Aug 4, 2015, at 1:32 PM, Andrea Giammarchi andrea.giammar...@gmail.com
wrote:
only promises that has passed through their initialization the callback would
be cancelable,and this could be reflected through a `.cancelable` property
That's precisely the problem. When you made a mistake
JSON is not that hard to parse incrementally. The i-json parser is
implemented in C++ with a fallback JS implementation. The C++
implementation is less than 1000 locs and the JS implementation less than
400 locs. The C++ implementation is 1.65 times slower than JSON.parse but,
unlike JSON.parse,
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 9:53 AM, Mark Miller erig...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 for line delimited JSON. It would be good to switch all users of
json-seq over to it and to deprecate json-seq. Perhaps an RFC would help.
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 11:53 PM, Bruno Jouhier bjouh...@gmail.com wrote:
RFC
8 matches
Mail list logo
