On 3 September 2015 at 01:58, Brendan Eich wrote:
> I was there, I just re-read and re-remembered. I do not agree with Allen
> that some tiny needle was uniquely threaded. Rather, an aesthetic
> preference for the new ES6 binding forms to have a lexical contour of their
>
saam barati wrote:
Thanks. Reading now.
I'm clearly bad at email :/
Naw, this stuff is always harder to find than it should be.
I was there, I just re-read and re-remembered. I do not agree with Allen
that some tiny needle was uniquely threaded. Rather, an aesthetic
preference for the new
Andreas Rossberg wrote:
On 3 September 2015 at 01:58, Brendan Eich > wrote:
I was there, I just re-read and re-remembered. I do not agree with
Allen that some tiny needle was uniquely threaded. Rather, an
aesthetic preference for the
On Sep 2, 2015, at 4:10 PM, John-David Dalton wrote:
> Hiya,
>
> > [Enumerate]] must obtain the own property keys of the target object as if
> > by calling its [[OwnPropertyKeys]] internal method
>
> Whoa that's tricky language. I assumed reading it that [[Enumerable]] was to
> follow the
John-David Dalton wrote:
> It's odd to me that:
>
> Reflect.ownKeys() has defined order but
> Reflect.enumerate() doesn't
>
> I'm using Reflect.enumerate() to create a `keysIn` implementation (like
> `keys` but for own & inherited key
> names).
>
> :+1: for more
On Sep 2, 2015, at 4:58 PM, Brendan Eich wrote:
> saam barati wrote:
>> Thanks. Reading now.
>>
>> I'm clearly bad at email :/
>
> Naw, this stuff is always harder to find than it should be.
>
> I was there, I just re-read and re-remembered. I do not agree with Allen that
> some tiny needle
Hiya,
> [Enumerate]] must obtain the own property keys of the target object as if
by calling its [[OwnPropertyKeys]] internal method
Whoa that's tricky language. I assumed reading it that [[Enumerable]] was
to follow the order of [[OwnPropertyKeys]] (as part of "as if by") and
walking the
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 6:39 PM, Behrang Saeedzadeh wrote:
> Looks like at the moment DOM does not expose any properties that signify
> whether an element has become hidden due to an overflow: hidden on their
> parent element.
>
> Any chance of adding this feature to DOM?
8 matches
Mail list logo