My 2 cents.
I always had the feeling people complaining about `RegExp.$1` and friends
never really used them.
For instance, your example:
```js
/(a)/.exec('a')
Object.keys(bar)
RegExp.$1
```
might have side effects but it's also made up and, I believe, not a
real-world concern.
If you use `re.e
Hi,
About the bad old nonstandard RegExp functionalities:
* `RegExp.prototype.compile()` — currently in Annex B;
* `RegExp.$1`, `RegExp.leftContext`, etc. — currently unspecced.
Although we could probably not get rid of them for plain regexps, I think it is
a good idea to disable them for prope
This is definitely interesting stuff. Have you considered rewriting this so
that it only uses generators? If you did then you could test natively in
Chrome and see if you get the same results.
- Matthew Robb
On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 7:01 PM, /#!/JoePea wrote:
> Just to show a little more detail
3 matches
Mail list logo