Re: Return value of forEach

i had seen some people transform{  doSth();  return;}toreturn void doSth();for saving the `{}` and line breaks. So maybereturn arr.forEach(...)is just been written due to same reason.

Re: Recent language addition suggestions

"backwards compatibility" is a nice thing. But making a language larger just means harder to be backwards compatibility. Supporting of more features do not mean more productive. Good features do contribute to productive. But there are more features just make things complex and less productive.