...and same for indexOf and lastIndexOf? ;-)
On 7 mar 2014, at 13:33, Domenic Denicola dome...@domenicdenicola.com wrote:
If that's the argument, then Array.prototype.contains should accept another
Array, not an element to check.
On Mar 7, 2014, at 5:49, medikoo
. They are common set
operations and they do seem missing from the Set draft spec.
Peter
___
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
-
Mariusz Nowak
https://github.com/medikoo
--
View this message
://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
-
Mariusz Nowak
https://github.com/medikoo
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Mutable-Proto-tp35188550p35196276.html
Sent from the Mozilla - ECMAScript 4 discussion mailing list archive at
Nabble.com
for the link. This is yet another inline cache
specialization for expandos on nodelists.
/be
___
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
-
Mariusz Nowak
https://github.com/medikoo
--
View
after legalizing __proto__ (I already had few valid use cases
for that in important projects)
but maybe we should deprecate `__proto__` (being a property is really
problematic) and standardize `Object.setPrototypeOf`? It would make things
much cleaner and safe.
Mariusz Nowak
-
Mariusz Nowak
. `then` should be
used *only* if you have a reason to extend the chain, and pass result
elsewhere.
-
Mariusz Nowak
https://github.com/medikoo
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Promises-tp34648686p34655893.html
Sent from the Mozilla - ECMAScript 4 discussion mailing list archive
:)
-
Mariusz Nowak
https://github.com/medikoo
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Promises-tp34648686p34655959.html
Sent from the Mozilla - ECMAScript 4 discussion mailing list archive at
Nabble.com.
___
es-discuss mailing list
es
@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
___
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
-
Mariusz Nowak
https://github.com/medikoo
--
View this message in context:
http
will make methods easily accessible for some functional
constructs, and I think might be revolutionary for those who favor such
functional way of programming.
Let me know what do you think about that.
--
Mariusz Nowak
https://github.com/medikoo
http://twitter.com/medikoo
-
Mariusz Nowak
https
currently the closest you can get to what will be
introduced in future with Harmony, so I plan to stick to that.
[1] https://github.com/medikoo/modules-webmake
--
Mariusz Nowak
twitter: http://twitter.com/medikoo
github: https://github.com/medikoo
-
Mariusz Nowak
https://github.com/medikoo
talk about synchronous loading then
Node.js style modules with help of modules-webmake[1] is simpler and more
powerful. I feel it's obvious.
[1] https://github.com/medikoo/modules-webmake
--
Mariusz Nowak
twitter: http://twitter.com/medikoo
github: https://github.com/medikoo
-
Mariusz Nowak
in that way it
originated from CommonJS).
Currently I can't imagine any need for packages implementation in browsers.
It's strictly just server-side and I assume it's fine to not have it
standardized
--
Mariusz Nowak
twitter: http://twitter.com/medikoo
github: https://github.com/medikoo
Mark S. Miller-2 wrote:
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 7:51 AM, Mariusz Nowak
medikoo+mozilla@medikoo.com wrote:
rauschma wrote:
For incrementally migrating old code bases, it would make a lot of
sense
to allow ES.next modules to import AMDs and vice versa.
-1
I'm not sure if I
Rick Waldron wrote:
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 3:56 PM, Mariusz Nowak
medikoo+mozilla@medikoo.com wrote:
I like it, it indeed looks very logical, however it's a bit controversial
that we need to create temporary array object to get one that we want.
Is the controversy editorial
Rick Waldron wrote:
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 3:34 AM, Mariusz Nowak
medikoo+mozilla@medikoo.com wrote:
Rick Waldron wrote:
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 3:56 PM, Mariusz Nowak
medikoo+mozilla@medikoo.com wrote:
I like it, it indeed looks very logical, however it's a bit
Rick Waldron wrote:
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 9:19 AM, Mariusz Nowak
medikoo+mozilla@medikoo.com wrote:
Rick Waldron wrote:
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 3:34 AM, Mariusz Nowak
medikoo+mozilla@medikoo.com wrote:
Rick Waldron wrote:
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 3:56 PM
= arr.length) length) {
arr = arr.concat(arr.slice(0, length - l));
}
return arr;
};
( https://github.com/medikoo/es5-ext/blob/master/lib/Array/generate.js )
--
Mariusz Nowak
https://github.com/medikoo/
rauschma wrote:
Array.prototype.repeat seems like a logical dual
is still c2.
= this.three === C.three
SUMMARY: I agree with your findings.
From my perspective, this proposal looks perfect. I wouldn't look further :)
-
Mariusz Nowak
https://github.com/medikoo
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Re%3A-es-discuss-Digest%2C-Vol-52%2C
);
c2.two(); // C.three
Thanks!
-
Mariusz Nowak
https://github.com/medikoo
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Making-%22super%22-work-outside-a-literal--tp31880450p31884964.html
Sent from the Mozilla - ECMAScript 4 discussion mailing list archive at
Nabble.com
.
-
Mariusz Nowak
https://github.com/medikoo
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/block-lambda-proposal-in-light-of-compiling-to-JavaScript-tp31876202p31885102.html
Sent from the Mozilla - ECMAScript 4 discussion mailing list archive at
Nabble.com
20 matches
Mail list logo
