For me the biggest thing JSON lacks is the ability to add comments.
---
R. Mark Volkmann
Object Computing, Inc.
> On Jul 25, 2018, at 4:26 AM, Isiah Meadows wrote:
>
> IMHO, I'd like to see four things:
>
> - Native JSON multi-object support
> - Binary data support th
when some libraries do not have type definitions is still far better than
not using types at all.
---
R. Mark Volkmann
Object Computing, Inc.
> On Jan 13, 2018, at 9:49 PM, Ranando King <king...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Stripping the types does solve the runtime problem, but o
If optional types in JS were implemented like they are in Flow, the types would
be stripped before runtime. There are only there for pre-runtime type checking.
So nothing related to optimization would change and there would be no runtime
type checking.
---
R. Mark Volkmann
Object Computing
gt;> > It seems like a lot of these features already aren't included in the
>> proposal. I definitely hold your view that the proposal has to be minimal,
>> but I think my minimal is functionally minimal. Something that when
>> implemented allows developers to experiment and then discussion can
>> progress from there to how more features can be added. I'm trying to be
>> thourough though as to not harm a future proposal so if any of my decisions
>> block something I'm open to changes.
>> >
>> > Most of my thoughts and focus have been on what I think of as the
>> basics. How types interact with declarations, functions, classes,
>> destructuring, allocation, and control structures. The future consideration
>> sections are mostly a catalogue of ensuring that these basic initial
>> features and designs will work as the language incorporates other proposals.
>> > ___
>> > es-discuss mailing list
>> > es-discuss@mozilla.org
>> > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>> ___
>> es-discuss mailing list
>> es-discuss@mozilla.org
>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>>
>
>
>
> ___
> es-discuss mailing list
> es-discuss@mozilla.org
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>
>
--
R. Mark Volkmann
Object Computing, Inc.
___
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
By default sort converts the values to strings and compares there Unicode
values. For example, 10 would come before 3. In the first example you are
overriding the default sort comparison in a way that is correct for numbers.
---
R. Mark Volkmann
Object Computing, Inc.
> On Oct 21, 2017, a
>> ```
>>
>> I’m curious why this proposal is not even listed in stage 0 proposal list.
>>
>>
>> Because no representative of TC39 has volunteered to champion it.
>>
>> —Claude
>>
>>
>> ___
>&g
ailing list
>> es-discuss@mozilla.org
>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>>
>
> ___
> es-discuss mailing list
> es-discuss@mozilla.org
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>
>
--
R. Mark Volkmann
Object Computing, Inc.
___
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
to use either foo
or bar after of in a for-of loop?
---
R. Mark Volkmann
Object Computing, Inc.
___
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
, Alexander Jones a...@weej.com wrote:
Arrays are not iterators - they have no `next` method. '`for-of` works on
iterables.
On Saturday, August 22, 2015, Mark Volkmann r.mark.volkm...@gmail.com
wrote:
I understand Arrays in ES 2015 are both iterable (have Symbol.iterator
method
I know the spec for this isn't finalized, but what is the current direction
for the behaviour when await is used on a function that is not marked async
and doesn't return a Promise? Should it run immediately or wait for the
next turn of the event loop?
--
R. Mark Volkmann
Object Computing, Inc
___
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
--
R. Mark Volkmann
Object Computing, Inc.
___
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org
___
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
--
R. Mark Volkmann
Object Computing, Inc.
___
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org
@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
___
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
--
R. Mark Volkmann
Object Computing, Inc
Fill in the blank.
In ES 2015, a JS source file is treated as a module if _.
a. it exports anything
b. it imports anything
c. both a and b
d. something else
---
R. Mark Volkmann
Object Computing, Inc.
___
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss
.
On Sun, Jul 5, 2015, 09:03 Mark Volkmann r.mark.volkm...@gmail.com
wrote:
Fill in the blank.
In ES 2015, a JS source file is treated as a module if _.
a. it exports anything
b. it imports anything
c. both a and b
d. something else
---
R. Mark Volkmann
Object Computing, Inc
/listinfo/es-discuss
___
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
--
R. Mark Volkmann
Object Computing, Inc.
___
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss
';
I don't see any place in the spec. where it describes whether
ModuleSpecifier should include a file extension. Maybe I just missed it. Is
Traceur correct to require it?
--
R. Mark Volkmann
Object Computing, Inc.
___
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss
-discuss-boun...@mozilla.org] *On Behalf Of *Mark
Volkmann
*Sent:* Sunday, May 31, 2015 17:21
*To:* es-discuss@mozilla.org
*Subject:* import ModuleSpecifier
I was under the impression that the following is a valid import statement:
import {something} from './somefile';
I know
The entries method of a Map doesn't take a function. It does return an array
though. That array contains [key, value] arrays. So you could do this.
map.entries().sort(([k1, v1], [k2, v2]) = k1.localeCompare(k2)).forEach(([k,
v]) = do-something);
---
R. Mark Volkmann
Object Computing, Inc
I couldn't find this in spec. Is it required for generator functions to
return an object that is both iterable (has Symbol.iterator method) and an
iterator (has next method). It seems Babel does this, but I want verify
whether that is required.
--
R. Mark Volkmann
Object Computing, Inc
done is true?
Clearly consumers shouldn't have to be aware of whether the iterator is
actually a generator and whether it ends by returning a value.
---
R. Mark Volkmann
Object Computing, Inc.
___
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https
I'm curious why one of the public symbols has a name that ends with Tag
(toStringTag), but the others don't (such as toPrimitive). Maybe
toStringTag should be changed to toString.
__ __
/ \/ \
\ /ark
Object Computing, Inc.
\ /
\/olkmann
On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 4:20
Agreed, like at the constants on the Math object.
---
R. Mark Volkmann
Object Computing, Inc.
On Feb 6, 2015, at 12:39 AM, Axel Rauschmayer a...@rauschma.de wrote:
I know that this is a small nit and that it’s probably too late, but:
Shouldn’t public symbols (`Symbol.iterator` etc.) have
I do the same as Kevin.
---
R. Mark Volkmann
Object Computing, Inc.
On Jan 22, 2015, at 4:51 PM, Kevin Smith zenpars...@gmail.com wrote:
FWIW, here's the rule of thumb that I tend to use:
- When referring to the language in general, it's Javascript or JS.
- When referring to a specific
Maybe this is wrong, but I'm in the habit of thinking that if something has
a value of null, something in JavaScript code (mine or a library I'm using)
explicitly set it to null. If something has a value of undefined, it was
never set. For that reason, I'd prefer using undefined in this case over
+1
---
R. Mark Volkmann
Object Computing, Inc.
On Jan 18, 2015, at 6:28 AM, Axel Rauschmayer a...@rauschma.de wrote:
Currently the keys of the entries returned by `Set.prototype.entries()` are
the same as the values:
```js
let set = new Set(['a', 'b']);
let pairs = [...set.entries
In addition, I don't think Traceur supports that syntax yet. I have had to
do this instead:
let f = x = {
return {foo: bar};
};
__ __
/ \/ \
\ /ark
Object Computing, Inc.
\ /olkmann
\/
___
es-discuss mailing list
!
On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 2:48 PM, Mark Volkmann r.mark.volkm...@gmail.com
wrote:
In addition, I don't think Traceur supports that syntax yet. I have had to
do this instead:
let f = x = {
return {foo: bar};
};
___
es-discuss mailing list
es
by a TC39 member. Can anyone point me to a library like that?
--
R. Mark Volkmann
Object Computing, Inc.
___
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
. Mark Volkmann
Object Computing, Inc.
___
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
rauschma.de
___
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
--
R. Mark Volkmann
Object Computing, Inc.
___
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
I understand that module code is implicitly in strict mode.
In an ES6 environment, what causes a .js file to be treated as a module?
Does that happen automatically to all files that export at least one thing?
--
R. Mark Volkmann
Object Computing, Inc
. That may lead people to always specify it with 'use
strict'. I was hoping to not have to do that.
--
R. Mark Volkmann
Object Computing, Inc.
___
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
:47 PM, Allen Wirfs-Brock al...@wirfs-brock.com
wrote:
On Oct 19, 2014, at 2:28 PM, Mark Volkmann wrote:
On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 4:23 PM, Allen Wirfs-Brock al...@wirfs-brock.com
wrote:
It is implementation dependent how it is determined whether an individual
file will be parsed as a Script
What happened to adding the Object.values and Object.entries methods? There
was some discussion that led me to believe these would be in ES6. Are they
now targeted for ES7?
--
R. Mark Volkmann
Object Computing, Inc.
___
es-discuss mailing list
es
+1 to Kevin's suggestions.
---
R. Mark Volkmann
Object Computing, Inc.
On Aug 6, 2014, at 7:10 AM, Kevin Smith zenpars...@gmail.com wrote:
Completely agree, the default should be removed. This is simply a proposal
of how we can still have a simple import statement (`import $ from
jQuery
Here's a link to my slides from a recent talk I gave on ES6.
I thought some on this list my find it interesting
and others might send me corrections. ;-)
http://sett.ociweb.com/sett/settJul2014.html
--
R. Mark Volkmann
Object Computing, Inc.
___
es
Are you sure? I just tried it and it worked for me.
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 1:23 PM, Maxime Warnier mar...@gmail.com wrote:
Your link seems to be broken ;)
2014-07-09 17:41 GMT+02:00 Mark Volkmann r.mark.volkm...@gmail.com:
Here's a link to my slides from a recent talk I gave on ES6.
I
import after the as.
Yes! I would SO much happier with this if the curly braces were removed.
--
R. Mark Volkmann
Object Computing, Inc.
___
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
What is the behavior if a module doesn't define a default export and the syntax
for importing the default export is used?
What is the behavior if a module only defines a default export and the syntax
for importing named imports is used?
---
R. Mark Volkmann
Object Computing, Inc.
On Jun 19
___
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
___
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
--
R. Mark Volkmann
. Axel Rauschmayer
a...@rauschma.de
rauschma.de
___
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
--
R. Mark Volkmann
Object Computing, Inc.
___
es-discuss
foo() {
// some code that eventually calls resolve or reject
}
Is this a crazy idea? Perhaps if this was available, it would be very rare
to actually write new Promise( in code.
--
R. Mark Volkmann
Object Computing, Inc.
___
es-discuss mailing list
es
I was wrong about that.
On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 8:59 AM, Erik Arvidsson erik.arvids...@gmail.comwrote:
The done function is injected by the Traceur test runner for async tests.
It is standard mocha stuff.
On Sunday, March 30, 2014 9:06:23 AM, Mark Volkmann
r.mark.volkm...@gmail.com wrote
Here's an article I wrote recently that may be of interest.
It covers automating the use of Traceur to generate ES5 code.
http://sett.ociweb.com/sett/settApr2014.html
--
R. Mark Volkmann
Object Computing, Inc.
___
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss
module exports that it identified as the
default (presumably the most commonly used things)
To define the default subset of things to export from a module,
export default = some-value or some-function;
where some-value could be an object holding a collection of things to
export.
--
R. Mark
at 8:22 AM, Domenic Denicola
dome...@domenicdenicola.com wrote:
Have you ever used JavaScript module systems before? If so, the idea of a
default export should be somewhat familiar...
On Mar 14, 2014, at 6:31, Mark Volkmann r.mark.volkm...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'm trying to understand
just focus on eliminating this one pointless and confusing
aspect (the export default [expr] form), we'll be good to go.
--
R. Mark Volkmann
Object Computing, Inc.
___
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo
waldron.r...@gmail.comwrote:
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Mark Volkmann r.mark.volkm...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 8:54 AM, Kevin Smith zenpars...@gmail.comwrote:
I'm trying to understand how that compares to ES6 modules. I see how in
ES6 I can import specific things from
Does ES6 add any new ways to iterate over the values in an object?
I've done a lot of searching, but haven't seen anything.
I'm wondering if there is something more elegant than this:
Object.keys(myObj).forEach(function (key) {
let obj = myObj[key];
// do something with obj
});
--
R. Mark
It seems to me that the main benefit is that it takes care of parsing out the
template parts around the expressions for you. Otherwise you might write a
regular expression to do that.
---
R. Mark Volkmann
Object Computing, Inc.
On Mar 6, 2014, at 5:29 PM, Caitlin Potter caitpotte...@gmail.com
/
.
--
R. Mark Volkmann
Object Computing, Inc.
___
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
What is an example of a use case where one would choose to use Array.of
instead of the literal array syntax?
--
R. Mark Volkmann
Object Computing, Inc.
___
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
Does a top-level let in a file (not inside any function) create a global
variable just like var or does it create a variable that is scoped to the
source file?
---
R. Mark Volkmann
Object Computing, Inc.
___
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss
54 matches
Mail list logo
