Re: Am I paranoid enough?

2009-02-21 Thread David-Sarah Hopwood
Waldemar Horwat wrote: What are you trying to do? Exclude all scripts that use the operator? Oops, I failed to describe the intended restrictions correctly. Any sequence of consecutive '' would be allowed if followed by AmpFollower. But at least this tells me you were paying attention ;-)

Re: Am I paranoid enough?

2009-02-20 Thread Waldemar Horwat
What are you trying to do? Exclude all scripts that use the operator? Waldemar David-Sarah Hopwood wrote: Suppose that S is a Unicode string in which each character matches ValidChar below, not containing the subsequences !, / or ]], and not containing ( followed by a character not

Re: [caplet] Am I paranoid enough?

2009-02-17 Thread David-Sarah Hopwood
Mike Samuel wrote: 2009/2/16 David-Sarah Hopwood david.hopw...@industrial-designers.co.uk Suppose that S is a Unicode string in which each character matches ValidChar below, not containing the subsequences !, / or ]], and not containing ( followed by a character not matching AmpFollower). S

Re: Am I paranoid enough?

2009-02-16 Thread David-Sarah Hopwood
No, I'm not paranoid enough yet. It's not sufficient only to say that the HTML is encoded as UTF-8 (see below). David-Sarah Hopwood wrote: [...] The HTML or XHTML document starts with a correct !DOCTYPE or ?xml declaration respectively, I meant, the document starts with !DOCTYPE HTML in the

Re: [caplet] Am I paranoid enough?

2009-02-16 Thread Mike Samuel
2009/2/16 David-Sarah Hopwood david.hopw...@industrial-designers.co.uk Suppose that S is a Unicode string in which each character matches ValidChar below, not containing the subsequences !, / or ]], and not containing ( followed by a character not matching AmpFollower). S encodes a