OK thanks for the link
On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 at 11:41, Andrea Giammarchi
wrote:
> Naveen, please read more about template literals tags, thanks.
>
>
> https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Template_literals#Tagged_templates
>
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 12:16 PM Naveen
Naveen, please read more about template literals tags, thanks.
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Template_literals#Tagged_templates
On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 12:16 PM Naveen Chawla
wrote:
> HTML tags? Afraid I still don't get that aspect. Perhaps my reading style
HTML tags? Afraid I still don't get that aspect. Perhaps my reading style
is not matching your writing style. I understood everything else. I would
still need a really simple example(/s) completed with sample input data
from start to finish (for tags).
Anyway from what I'm seeing so far I think
A lot of libraries flatten template tags for a reason or another. The JSX
oriented `htm` project [1], as example, does that to obtain a single key,
since TypeScript has broken template literals, and avoiding duplicated work
per same literal is a common template tag based libraries use case.
Here
I don't know what you mean by tags. I guess this is outside my experience
area. I'd love to know the use case. Hope I'm not bothering you or anyone
else reading this thread
On Fri, 16 Aug 2019, 21:00 Jordan Harband, wrote:
> Can you elaborate a bit more on how this is a *common* case in the
Can you elaborate a bit more on how this is a *common* case in the wider
ecosystem?
On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 5:29 AM Andrea Giammarchi <
andrea.giammar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> early reply "which otehr cases"? this is just an example:
>
> [2019, 08, 16, 14, 28, 30].map(i => i < 10 ? ('0' + i)
early reply "which otehr cases"? this is just an example:
[2019, 08, 16, 14, 28, 30].map(i => i < 10 ? ('0' + i) :
i).joinWith('--T::.');
On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 2:24 PM Andrea Giammarchi <
andrea.giammar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> `this ${Symbol('throws')} an error`, so anything that cannot
`this ${Symbol('throws')} an error`, so anything that cannot be represented
as string should throw too, as it is for `[1, 2, 3].join(Symbol())`.
In few words, everything described as parameter for the
`Array.prototype.join(param)` should be described as the iterable value,
nothng new to add,
Cool.
I get it now apart from the "templated string" example. I'm not very
knowledgable about templated strings but on the face it looks like
'a${x}b${y}' already inserts x and y into the string, so I'm not sure what
else is happening with your proposed method? Clearly I've missed something.
given an array, it joins it through the values of the iterable argument,
without ever resulting to undefined
['a', 'b', 'c'].joinWith(['-']) would produce "a-b-c"
['a', 'b', 'c'].joinWith([1, 2]) would produce "a1b2c"
['a', 'b', 'c'].joinWith('012') would produce "a0b1c"
note the string, as
I'm just not seeing what it's supposed to do. If you could give a brief
explanation of the array method, and the string method then of course I
would get it. I know it would seem obvious to you from the examples alone,
it's just not to me.
On Fri, 16 Aug 2019 at 08:32, Andrea Giammarchi
wrote:
Just to re-state: zip from lowdash, does **not** do what my proposed method
does ... anything that won't produce the following result is not what I'm
proposing
console.log(['a', 'b', 'c', 'd'].joinWith([1, 2]));
// a1b2c1d
function tag2str(template, ...values) {
return
For that, I'd rather see an `interleave` that just rotates through all
its arguments. It'd be basically sugar for `.zip().flat()`, but an
implementation could optimize the heck out of it. (In particular, they
could iterate through them one-by-one and only allocate once, not in
the hot loop, so
There is a whole example that produces a string, like join does, using the
second argument iterable to fill the "junctions" ... which part is not
clear in the test case?
```js
console.log(['a', 'b', 'c', 'd'].joinWith([1, 2]));
// a1b2c1d
function tag2str(template, ...values) {
return
"weave"? (I've likely missed the purpose of the method)
On Thu, 15 Aug 2019, 18:12 Andrea Giammarchi,
wrote:
> That;s not useful for template literals tags though
>
> _.zip(['a', 'b', 'c'], [1, 2]);
> [["a", 1], ["b", 2], ["c", undefined]]
>
> it basically does nothing I've proposed ... any
That;s not useful for template literals tags though
_.zip(['a', 'b', 'c'], [1, 2]);
[["a", 1], ["b", 2], ["c", undefined]]
it basically does nothing I've proposed ... any other name suggestion?
On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 3:40 PM Michał Wadas wrote:
> https://lodash.com/docs/#zip
>
https://lodash.com/docs/#zip
https://docs.python.org/3/library/functions.html#zip
On Thu, 15 Aug 2019, 15:34 Andrea Giammarchi,
wrote:
>
>1. the suggested name is just ... suggested, I don't have strong
>opinion on it, it just `join` values through other values
>2. what's
1. the suggested name is just ... suggested, I don't have strong opinion
on it, it just `join` values through other values
2. what's `Array.zip` ? I've no idea
On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 12:53 PM Michał Wadas wrote:
> I would rather see Array.zip, it covers this use case.
>
> On Thu, 15
I would rather see Array.zip, it covers this use case.
On Thu, 15 Aug 2019, 10:50 Andrea Giammarchi,
wrote:
>
> I wonder if there's any interest in adding another handy Array method as
> joinWith could be:
>
> ```js
> // proposal example
> Array.prototype.joinWith = function (values) {
>
I wonder if there's any interest in adding another handy Array method as
joinWith could be:
```js
// proposal example
Array.prototype.joinWith = function (values) {
const {length} = this;
if (length < 2)
return this.join('');
const out = [this[0]];
const len = values.length;
for
20 matches
Mail list logo
