Is it possible to add proposals to spec?
___
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 7:59 PM, Allen Wirfs-Brock al...@wirfs-brock.com wrote:
The Ecma General Assembly has approved by letter ballot Ecma-404: THE JSON
Data Interchange Formal
See http://www.ecma-international.org/publications/standards/Ecma-404.htm
I'm glad the alphabet is now defined (and
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 7:59 PM, Allen Wirfs-Brock al...@wirfs-brock.com wrote:
The Ecma General Assembly has approved by letter ballot Ecma-404: THE JSON
Data Interchange Formal
See http://www.ecma-international.org/publications/standards/Ecma-404.htm
I'm glad the alphabet is now defined (and
On 8 Oct 2013, at 19:59, Allen Wirfs-Brock al...@wirfs-brock.com wrote:
The Ecma General Assembly has approved by letter ballot Ecma-404: THE JSON
Data Interchange Formal
See http://www.ecma-international.org/publications/standards/Ecma-404.htm
As for Unicode, it explicitly refers to Unicode
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Mathias Bynens math...@qiwi.be wrote:
On 8 Oct 2013, at 19:59, Allen Wirfs-Brock al...@wirfs-brock.com wrote:
The Ecma General Assembly has approved by letter ballot Ecma-404: THE
JSON Data Interchange Formal
See
On 08/10/2013, at 19:59, Allen Wirfs-Brock wrote:
The Ecma General Assembly has approved by letter ballot Ecma-404: THE JSON
Data Interchange Formal
See http://www.ecma-international.org/publications/standards/Ecma-404.htm
It provides the normative specification of the syntax of JSON Text
On 8 Oct 2013, at 22:19, Rick Waldron waldron.r...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Mathias Bynens math...@qiwi.be wrote:
As for Unicode, it explicitly refers to Unicode 6.2.0, even though version
6.3.0 was released last week.
The document was written in July, which was
On 8 Oct 2013, at 23:39, Mark S. Miller erig...@google.com wrote:
JSON must not change. If it refers to the latest Unicode, whatever that is,
then it is potentially subject to disruption by (admittedly unlikely) future
changes to Unicode.
By that logic, it should have referred to either
8 matches
Mail list logo