Le 16/08/2012 04:40, Allen Wirfs-Brock a écrit :
On Aug 15, 2012, at 5:09 PM, David Bruant wrote:
Le 14/08/2012 04:16, Allen Wirfs-Brock a écrit :
check out the current ES66 spec. draft. Based upon discussions at the
March TC39 meeting hypot2 was eliminated and an optional third
argument as
Le 14/08/2012 04:16, Allen Wirfs-Brock a écrit :
check out the current ES66 spec. draft. Based upon discussions at the
March TC39 meeting hypot2 was eliminated and an optional third
argument as added to hypot.
Quoting relevant part of the March meeting notes [1]:
Discussion of hypot, hypot2.
On Aug 15, 2012, at 5:09 PM, David Bruant wrote:
Le 14/08/2012 04:16, Allen Wirfs-Brock a écrit :
check out the current ES66 spec. draft. Based upon discussions at the
March TC39 meeting hypot2 was eliminated and an optional third
argument as added to hypot.
Quoting relevant part of the
Hi,
what about adding square and cube functions which accept any number of
arguments and return sum of squares/cubes? For one arg, they would just
return square/cube as expected, for more they will sum them (for none
return 0 of course).
Herby
Allen Wirfs-Brock wrote:
check out the
I think these things are really easy to implement and fast enough in
current JS engines, e.g.
function cube() {
return cube.reduce.call(arguments, cube.iterator, 0);
}
cube.reduce = [].reduce;
cube.iterator = function (p, c) {
return p + Math.pow(c, 3);
};
alert(cube(2, 3)); // 35
br
On
For reference, there is a proposal for a DSP-library[1] for the W3C Web Audio
API, that would solve a very similar 'problem' in a browser, it also covers
most of the use-cases for the other variadic `Math' functions that are proposed.
function cube(sourceArray) {
DSP.pow(tempArray,
Hi,
I'd like to provide some feedback on the more math functions proposal
[1] (and the most recent PDF at the top of the page)
The hypot and hypot2 functions accept 2 or 3 arguments, but I don't see
a reason why they wouldn't accept an unbounded number of arguments.
Although the physical
Am 13.08.2012 11:16, schrieb David Bruant:
I'd like to talk about naming as well. hypot (for Hypotenuse) is an
accurate name for the 2 dimension case, but much less for 3 dimensions
as far as I know (the English wikipedia page [2] doesn't mention the 3D
case either) and even less for
Le 13/08/2012 19:56, Christian Mayer a écrit :
Am 13.08.2012 11:16, schrieb David Bruant:
I'd like to talk about naming as well. hypot (for Hypotenuse) is an
accurate name for the 2 dimension case, but much less for 3 dimensions
as far as I know (the English wikipedia page [2] doesn't mention
check out the current ES66 spec. draft. Based upon discussions at the March
TC39 meeting hypot2 was eliminated and an optional third argument as added to
hypot.
Note that the new function names such as hypot are generally selected to match
the names from widely used c libraries:
10 matches
Mail list logo
