On Saturday, December 22, 2012 at 12:34 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Erik Arvidsson
erik.arvids...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 6:45 PM, Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com wrote:
There is an alternative. Python (as of version 3.3) has implemented a
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 6:45 PM, Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com wrote:
There is an alternative. Python (as of version 3.3) has implemented a
new Flexible String Representation, aka PEP-393; the same has existed
in Pike for some time. A string is stored in memory with a fixed
number of bytes
On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Erik Arvidsson
erik.arvids...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 6:45 PM, Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com wrote:
There is an alternative. Python (as of version 3.3) has implemented a
new Flexible String Representation, aka PEP-393; the same has existed
The man main complication for compatibility is indexing.
See
http://macchiati.blogspot.com/2012/07/unicode-string-models-many-programming.html
If you look back about a year in this list's archive you'll find a long
discussion.
{phone}
On Dec 21, 2012 9:34 PM, Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com
On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 5:20 PM, Mark Davis ☕ m...@macchiato.com wrote:
The man main complication for compatibility is indexing.
See
http://macchiati.blogspot.com/2012/07/unicode-string-models-many-programming.html
Right, and that's the exact issue. If a programming language had a bug
wherein
5 matches
Mail list logo
