Fwd: An idea to extend the functionality of Proxy objects.

-- Forwarded message -- From: Ranando King Date: Sat, Jan 13, 2018 at 2:35 PM Subject: Re: An idea to extend the functionality of Proxy objects. To: Isiah Meadows Sorry clicked send before editing. The first version is the original,

Fwd: An idea to extend the functionality of Proxy objects.

-- Forwarded message -- From: Ranando King Date: Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 12:34 AM Subject: Re: An idea to extend the functionality of Proxy objects. To: Isiah Meadows I'm only including the altered verbiage for each internal method. The

Fwd: An idea to extend the functionality of Proxy objects.

-- Forwarded message -- From: Ranando King Date: Sat, Jan 13, 2018 at 2:32 PM Subject: Re: An idea to extend the functionality of Proxy objects. To: Isiah Meadows After thinking about it a bit more, maybe you mean something like this:

Fwd: An idea to extend the functionality of Proxy objects.

-- Forwarded message -- From: Ranando King Date: Sat, Jan 13, 2018 at 2:23 PM Subject: Re: An idea to extend the functionality of Proxy objects. To: Isiah Meadows While I understand what you're getting at, The invariants would *not*

Fwd: An idea to extend the functionality of Proxy objects.

-- Forwarded message -- From: Isiah Meadows Date: Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 9:07 PM Subject: Re: An idea to extend the functionality of Proxy objects. To: Ranando King Not full, but changes of some kind will likely be required, and you

Fwd: An idea to extend the functionality of Proxy objects.

-- Forwarded message -- From: Ranando King Date: Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 7:41 PM Subject: Re: An idea to extend the functionality of Proxy objects. To: Isiah Meadows You're right about the mistake with Object.seal. I wasn't too focused on