From: es-discuss [mailto:es-discuss-boun...@mozilla.org] On Behalf Of Benjamin
(Inglor) Gruenbaum
I think a centralised site similar to php's for holding all proposals
currently discussed as well as a place for people to leave comments or
directing them to this mailing list.
Way ahead of
This looks sweet Domenic!
Especially things like
https://github.com/tc39/Array.prototype.includes/blob/master/README.md
It would be great it if were standardised and made more readable (the
sidebar for example)
On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 11:43 PM, Domenic Denicola d...@domenic.me wrote:
From:
Benjamin (Inglor) Gruenbaum wrote:
For example - I don't need to know or understand what
`[[ReferenceGet]]` is to understand something written in this sort of
style: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/combined-comparison-operator
Not bad -- we are using gists and github markdown but could build that
From: es-discuss [mailto:es-discuss-boun...@mozilla.org] On Behalf Of Brendan
Eich
Not bad -- we are using gists and github markdown but could build that up to
mimic the PHP structure and style a bit, if enough people find value in it.
FYI the new hotness is Ecmarkup + Ecmarkdown as in e.g.
Not bad -- we are using gists and github markdown but could build that up
to mimic the PHP structure and style a bit, if enough people find value in
it.
PHP's ircmaxell told me they're using WikiText - for example:
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/combined-comparison-operator?do=editrev=0
It shouldn't
Regarding the general idea of motivation/introductory materials, I think the
new process explicitly encourages this, and indeed most new proposals include
that in their README or similar. Examples:
- https://github.com/tc39/Array.prototype.includes/blob/master/README.md
-
On 22 Jan 2015, at 10:29 , Brendan Eich bren...@mozilla.org wrote:
ECMA-357 (E4X) pioneered informative-first prose sections, not found in
ECMA-262 Ed. 3, and as a direct consequence, had too many imprecise or even
inaccurate informative notes, which (turns out) were misread as normative
Follow-up thought: people still link to the (completely outdated)
proposals on the wiki, because they are often very readable.
I think people mostly link to them because they are rank pretty well in
search results and are confined to a single problem in a readable way.
I think the way PHP
a...@rauschma.de wrote:
On 22 Jan 2015, at 10:29 , Brendan Eich bren...@mozilla.org
mailto:bren...@mozilla.org wrote:
ECMA-357 (E4X) pioneered informative-first prose sections, not found in
ECMA-262 Ed. 3, and as a direct consequence, had too many imprecise or even
inaccurate informative notes
9 matches
Mail list logo
