On 26 Aug 2014, at 02:16, Norbert Lindenberg
ecmascr...@lindenbergsoftware.com wrote:
[…]
Thanks for confirming. Sounds like my “ES6 Unicode regular expressions to ES5”
transpiler is working correctly, then: https://github.com/mathiasbynens/regexpu
Demo: http://mothereff.in/regexpu (Bug
I've thought about this a bit. I was initially inclined to agree with the idea
of extending the existing character classes similar to what Mathias' proposes.
But I now think that is probably not a very good idea and that what is
currently spec'ed (essentially that the /u flag doesn't change
On 26 Aug 2014, at 19:01, Allen Wirfs-Brock al...@wirfs-brock.com wrote:
I've thought about this a bit. I was initially inclined to agree with the
idea of extending the existing character classes similar to what Mathias'
proposes. But I now think that is probably not a very good idea and
On Aug 26, 2014, at 10:01 , Allen Wirfs-Brock al...@wirfs-brock.com wrote:
So, here is a summary of my proposal:
3) Reserve within /u RegExp patterns, the syntax \p{characters} and
\P{characters}
This was already decided by TC39 at the March 2012 meeting, and if I read the
spec correctly,
Le 26 août 2014 à 19:01, Allen Wirfs-Brock al...@wirfs-brock.com a écrit :
3) Reserve within /u RegExp patterns, the syntax \p{characters} and
\P{characters}
I'll go even further: when the `u` flag is on, it shall be verboten for
implementations to interpret `\` followed by one of 0-9, A-Z or
On Aug 26, 2014, at 11:16 AM, Norbert Lindenberg wrote:
On Aug 26, 2014, at 10:01 , Allen Wirfs-Brock al...@wirfs-brock.com wrote:
So, here is a summary of my proposal:
3) Reserve within /u RegExp patterns, the syntax \p{characters} and
\P{characters}
This was already decided by
Le 26 août 2014 à 20:15, Mathias Bynens math...@qiwi.be a écrit :
On 26 Aug 2014, at 19:01, Allen Wirfs-Brock al...@wirfs-brock.com wrote:
I've thought about this a bit. I was initially inclined to agree with the
idea of extending the existing character classes similar to what Mathias'
On Aug 26, 2014, at 11:15 , Mathias Bynens math...@qiwi.be wrote:
On 26 Aug 2014, at 19:01, Allen Wirfs-Brock al...@wirfs-brock.com wrote:
I see one remaining issue:
In ES5 (and ES6): `/a-z/i` does not match U+017F (ſ) or U+212A (K) because
the ES canonicalization algorithm excludes
On Aug 26, 2014, at 1:45 PM, Norbert Lindenberg wrote:
On Aug 26, 2014, at 11:15 , Mathias Bynens math...@qiwi.be wrote:
On 26 Aug 2014, at 19:01, Allen Wirfs-Brock al...@wirfs-brock.com wrote:
I see one remaining issue:
In ES5 (and ES6): `/a-z/i` does not match U+017F (ſ) or U+212A
Norbert’s original proposal for the `u` flag
(http://norbertlindenberg.com/2012/05/ecmascript-supplementary-characters/#RegExp)
mentioned the following:
Possibly the definition of the character classes `\d\D\w\W\b\B` is extended
to their Unicode extensions, such as all characters in the
(Forwarding to Norbert as I don't know how closely he follows es-discuss.)
-- Forwarded message --
From: Mathias Bynens math...@qiwi.be
Date: Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 10:59 AM
Subject: Questions regarding ES6 Unicode regular expressions
To: es-discuss es-discuss@mozilla.org
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 11:44 AM, Till Schneidereit
t...@tillschneidereit.net wrote:
(Forwarding to Norbert as I don't know how closely he follows es-discuss.)
I think last year somewhere regular expression extensions were
postponed because nobody was interested in working out detailed
On Aug 25, 2014, at 1:59 , Mathias Bynens math...@qiwi.be wrote:
Norbert’s original proposal for the `u` flag
(http://norbertlindenberg.com/2012/05/ecmascript-supplementary-characters/#RegExp)
mentioned the following:
Possibly the definition of the character classes `\d\D\w\W\b\B` is
13 matches
Mail list logo
