Domenic Denicola wrote:
Seeing as how I just produced a completely redundant message by
failing to read the other responses before firing off my own, let me
try to redeem myself with some more-original content.
(Nice post!)
It’s also important to realize that streams are not the only
The same argument also implies that arrays are more powerful than scalar
values, and we should e.g. never use a number when we could instead just use a
single-element array with a number.
From: es-discuss [mailto:es-discuss-boun...@mozilla.org] On Behalf Of Boopathi
Rajaa
Sent: Saturday, March
Seeing as how I just produced a completely redundant message by failing to read
the other responses before firing off my own, let me try to redeem myself with
some more-original content.
It’s also important to realize that streams are not the only
asynchronous-plural primitive out there. My
On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 1:14 PM, Boopathi Rajaa legend.r...@gmail.com wrote:
Why do we have both?
Why do we have both values and arrays, not just the latter?
--
https://annevankesteren.nl/
___
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
Synchronously, we have both normal (synchronous) function calls and iteration
over a sequence of values (via `for-of` and iterators). It makes sense that we
also should have two abstractions for asynchronous interaction.
On 28 Mar 2015, at 13:14, Boopathi Rajaa legend.r...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe the confusion stems from how Promises were used in ES5? ES5 doesn't
support generators, so people ended up adding a sort of psuedo-generator
API to their promise APIs, but in reality the concepts solve different
problems? FYI, python seems to use promises and event streams together in
its
6 matches
Mail list logo
