Can we move this to stage 2?
- We have a spec draft: claudepache.github.io/ecma262/#sec-pattern,
claudepache.github.io/ecma262/#sec-pattern
- We have champions: Gorkem Yakin, Nozomu Katō and Brian Terlson
- I'm pretty sure this is going to be part of the standard according to the
last TC39
From: es-discuss [mailto:es-discuss-boun...@mozilla.org] On Behalf Of Yang Guo
> - We have a spec draft: http://claudepache.github.io/ecma262/#sec-pattern,
> http://claudepache.github.io/ecma262/#sec-pattern
> - We have champions: Gorkem Yakin, Nozomu Katō and Brian Terlson
Hmm, but none of the
-l.html
-Original Message-
From: es-discuss [mailto:es-discuss-boun...@mozilla.org] On Behalf Of Domenic
Denicola
Sent: Friday, December 11, 2015 8:42 AM
To: Yang Guo <yang...@chromium.org>; es-discuss@mozilla.org
Subject: RE: Re: Backward running version look-behinds
From: es-d
riginal Message-
> From: es-discuss [mailto:es-discuss-boun...@mozilla.org] On Behalf Of
> Domenic Denicola
> Sent: Friday, December 11, 2015 8:42 AM
> To: Yang Guo <yang...@chromium.org>; es-discuss@mozilla.org
> Subject: RE: Re: Backward running version look-behinds
>
>
FWIW this is precisely how it works in .NET as well (reverse order of
capture and back reference). While it might be surprising, it makes sense
with the backward read direction in mind.
I'm not fond of the idea of throwing syntax error if the back reference is
to the right of the capture inside a
5 matches
Mail list logo