Re: .next('yo') in newborn generators

2014-02-25 Thread Allen Wirfs-Brock
On Feb 25, 2014, at 5:04 AM, Erik Arvidsson wrote: I think we can settle this now. Lets allow an argument. Fine by me. I'd be happy to make the change now and confirm it at the next meeting. I'm not expecting any push back. Allen ___

Re: Re: .next('yo') in newborn generators

2014-02-19 Thread Bradley Meck
Digging up old threads, but is there a way to test for newborn generators? To my knowledge they are the only iterable that does not allow a value to be passed in at a specific time. ___ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org

Re: .next('yo') in newborn generators

2014-02-19 Thread Brendan Eich
Bradley Meck wrote: Digging up old threads, but is there a way to test for newborn generators? No. To my knowledge they are the only iterable that does not allow a value to be passed in at a specific time. What do you mean by does not allow? /be

Re: .next('yo') in newborn generators

2014-01-15 Thread Allen Wirfs-Brock
On Jan 15, 2014, at 8:32 AM, David Bruant wrote: Hi, Playing with the test cases of the regenerator project [1], I came across a case and was wondering what the intention of the spec is given that Firefox and Chrome recent implementations diverge. Apologies for not reading all the