Alexander Jones wrote:
That's exactly what this is. I appreciate the beauty in symmetry, but I
think -1.
I second this.
On 27 August 2015 at 17:25, Kevin Smith zenpars...@gmail.com
mailto:zenpars...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd expect the following to work, given that the prop expression
That's exactly what this is. I appreciate the beauty in symmetry, but I
think -1.
On 27 August 2015 at 17:25, Kevin Smith zenpars...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd expect the following to work, given that the prop expression evaluates
to 'bar', and bar is in context.
var foo = 'bar'
var bar =
I'm usually lousy at interpreting the spec (yet here I go!), but I think
the behavior is explained here [1]:
PropertyDefinition[Yield] :
IdentifierReference[?Yield]
CoverInitializedName[?Yield]
PropertyName[?Yield] : AssignmentExpression[In, ?Yield]
MethodDefinition[?Yield]
I'd expect the following to work, given that the prop expression evaluates
to 'bar', and bar is in context.
var foo = 'bar'
var bar = 'ponyfoo'
var baz = { [foo] }
console.log(baz)
// - { bar: 'ponyfoo' }
Hmmm... I'm not sure I would expect any such thing. It seems like you're
4 matches
Mail list logo