Le 01/04/2012 13:38, Wes Garland a écrit :
In a similar vein, I would personally like to have
zero-cost-when-not-debugging assert() statements, and am hopeful that
statically-linked modules might lead the way.
It seems to me that what you're asking for is macros, isn't it?
I read hints here
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 7:03 AM, David Bruant bruan...@gmail.com wrote:
Le 01/04/2012 13:38, Wes Garland a écrit :
In a similar vein, I would personally like to have
zero-cost-when-not-debugging assert() statements, and am hopeful that
statically-linked modules might lead the way.
It seems
Le 03/04/2012 17:12, John J Barton a écrit :
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 7:03 AM, David Bruant bruan...@gmail.com
mailto:bruan...@gmail.com wrote:
Le 01/04/2012 13:38, Wes Garland a écrit :
In a similar vein, I would personally like to have
zero-cost-when-not-debugging assert()
In a similar vein, I would personally like to have
zero-cost-when-not-debugging assert() statements, and am hopeful that
statically-linked modules might lead the way.
We currently have LOW cost assert() statements, but these are still not
suitable for hot loops. We can turn them into zero-cost
4 matches
Mail list logo
