Standard Prelude (was: for own(...) loop (spin-off from Re: for..in, hasOwnProperty(), and inheritance))

On Nov 8, 2011, at 8:39 PM, David Herman wrote: Instead of taking a hard-to-use-right form like for-in and partly taming it, I'd rather suggest people simply move to for-of, and have the default keys iterator Do The Right Thing and only iterate over own, enumerable property names (thanks

Re: Standard Prelude (was: for own(...) loop (spin-off from Re: for..in, hasOwnProperty(), and inheritance))

Let's answer this once we have the module-ized version of the standard library. Which I've been promising for far too long (mea culpa). Will get started on this tonight. Dave On Nov 8, 2011, at 9:04 PM, Brendan Eich wrote: On Nov 8, 2011, at 8:39 PM, David Herman wrote: Instead of taking