I might change my mind when I see it, but this sounds really scary. There are
all kinds of places where dependencies on identifier names, global objects not
having changed, etc. can sneak in.
Waldemar
Mark S. Miller wrote:
The Redmond mtg is fast approaching. We'd like to put out an
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 10:41, Garrett Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/9/18 Mark S. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The Redmond mtg is fast approaching. We'd like to put out an official
for-Redmond-mtg draft of the ES3.1 spec by then. I had volunteered to write
the spec for
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 11:49 PM, Erik Arvidsson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 10:41, Garrett Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/9/18 Mark S. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
There is really no point in exposing the two different cases in a
spec. A spec should describe the
The Redmond mtg is fast approaching. We'd like to put out an official
for-Redmond-mtg draft of the ES3.1 spec by then. I had volunteered to write
the spec for Function.prototype.bind(). Long term, I think we all agree we'd
like to see this spec and many others self-hosted in EcmaScript. However,
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 1:41 PM, Garrett Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/9/18 Mark S. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The Redmond mtg is fast approaching. We'd like to put out an official
for-Redmond-mtg draft of the ES3.1 spec by then. I had volunteered to write
the spec for
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 11:05 AM, Mike Shaver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 1:41 PM, Garrett Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
What pseudo-code style? This:
The pseudo-code style from the existing ES3 spec. An example:
11.3.1 Postfix Increment Operator
The production
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 11:05 AM, Mike Shaver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 1:41 PM, Garrett Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/9/18 Mark S. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
OK. I think I got what you're saying now. I've taken the consideration
that |arguments| may be deprecated. I
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 3:32 PM, Garrett Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Is this anywhere close to being what you're looking for?
Yes. I haven't yet read it in any detail, but it definitely has the form I'm
looking for. Thanks!
--
Cheers,
--MarkM
8 matches
Mail list logo