On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 6:05 PM, Brandon Benvie
bran...@brandonbenvie.com wrote:
The primary issue is that most array-likes aren't array-like when it comes
to mutability. Most exposed indexed objects don't allow changes to their
indices, which is decidedly un-array-like for ~quarter of array
True, concat specifically needs to be changed. But it is the only Array
method that does that check (the only other internal checks
for brand BuiltinArray are in apply and isArray I think).
On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 1:33 PM, Erik Arvidsson erik.arvids...@gmail.comwrote:
On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at
On Dec 31, 2012, at 10:39 AM, Brandon Benvie wrote:
True, concat specifically needs to be changed. But it is the only Array
method that does that check (the only other internal checks for brand
BuiltinArray are in apply and isArray I think).
In support of Array subclassing, I have a tweak
The work so far in the spec on enabling subclassing has been awesome and I
look forward to seeing this!
On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 1:52 PM, Allen Wirfs-Brock al...@wirfs-brock.comwrote:
In support of Array subclassing, I have a tweak to concat that allows
properly formed subclasses of Array to
From: es-discuss-boun...@mozilla.org [mailto:es-discuss-boun...@mozilla.org]
On Behalf Of Anne van Kesteren
Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2012 17:18
On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 10:22 PM, Axel Rauschmayer a...@rauschma.de wrote:
5. Array-like objects [not completely fixed (DOM...), but
On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 11:23 PM, Domenic Denicola
dome...@domenicdenicola.com wrote:
I saw this happen, and was sad, but never understood what the legacy problem
was.
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81573
In particular https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81573#c45
The problem
Domenic Denicola wrote:
From: es-discuss-boun...@mozilla.org [mailto:es-discuss-boun...@mozilla.org] On
Behalf Of Anne van Kesteren
Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2012 17:18
On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 10:22 PM, Axel Rauschmayera...@rauschma.de wrote:
5. Array-like objects [not completely fixed
The problem was code that incorrectly assumed instanceof to mean that the
instance was an Array in combination with Array.prototype.concat.
There was a bug in Google's Closure Library which caused almost all
Google's apps to fail due to this. The library was updated as soon as this
was found but
To clarify, my message was about making NodeLists have Array.prototype in
its prototype chain.
On Dec 30, 2012 5:50 PM, Erik Arvidsson erik.arvids...@gmail.com wrote:
The problem was code that incorrectly assumed instanceof to mean that the
instance was an Array in combination with
The primary issue is that most array-likes aren't array-like when it comes
to mutability. Most exposed indexed objects don't allow changes to their
indices, which is decidedly un-array-like for ~quarter of array operations.
It would be useful for there to be a separate Indexed class/prototype
that
10 matches
Mail list logo
