Thanks Claude, I agree. I have added it to the agenda as well.
https://github.com/tc39/agendas/blob/master/2020/02.md
On Mon, Dec 9, 2019 at 12:45 AM Claude Pache wrote:
>
>
> Le 8 déc. 2019 à 15:39, Mark S. Miller a écrit :
>
> Wow, Edge is definitely in violation of the intent of the spec,
On Sat, Dec 7, 2019 at 2:01 PM wrote:
>> I do find it surprising that property access isn't addressed there,
>> but it seems like it was likely just overlooked - it has no mention in
>> the repo, in the open issues, or even in the closed issues or any of
>> the open or closed pull requests.
>
>
> Le 8 déc. 2019 à 15:39, Mark S. Miller a écrit :
>
> Wow, Edge is definitely in violation of the intent of the spec, and the
> intent of the history of treatments of .caller in previous discussions and
> specs over the years. The Edge behavior is grossly unsafe.
>
> Hi Jack, thanks for
> Le 8 déc. 2019 à 20:49, Jack Works a écrit :
>
> I thought the "caller" has been removed from the spec, so there isn't much to
> do with the "caller" since it is not standard. It's implementation's own
> extension.
> But maybe we can also extend The forbidden extensions section.
The
4 matches
Mail list logo
