OK. Now I've read the email threads (didn't found them the first time).
Now I understand why.
Thanks.
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 10:00 PM, Brendan Eich bren...@mozilla.com wrote:
Yup.
Look (Licio), we've been over this many times, recorded here in es-discuss
(directly in posts and in TC39
It's really needed to make js syntax more complex in order to implement
generators?
It's function* really needed?
can you just expose Generator as a core function?
can yield be a function-call-like-construct instead of a new language
construction?
function fibonacci() {
let [prev, curr] = [0,
);
}
}
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 4:08 PM, Rick Waldron waldron.r...@gmail.comwrote:
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 1:01 PM, Lucio Tato luciot...@gmail.com wrote:
It's really needed to make js syntax more complex in order to implement
generators?
It's function* really needed?
Yes, because `yield` is only
3 matches
Mail list logo
