Re: [Idea] Bind operator as some sort of property acessor

The array map was a bad choice for the examples and got me distracted. Anyway, the example for the operator (arr::push) is something that I agree with you and I believe I suggested this at the proposal more than an year ago. If im not wrong, there's a thread like issue discussing this.

Re: [Idea] Bind operator as some sort of property acessor

Yeah, you are right. The docs seems a bit confusing and I didn't notice it. Thanks for the attention Em ter, 7 de mar de 2017 às 21:43, Logan Smyth escreveu: Unless I'm misunderstanding what you are looking for, I believe the current proposal accounts for this as

Re: [Idea] Bind operator as some sort of property acessor

Unless I'm misunderstanding what you are looking for, I believe the current proposal accounts for this as `::arr.push` with no expression before the `::`. Logan On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 4:33 PM, Augusto Moura wrote: > Before I open any suggestion for my ideia in the

[Idea] Bind operator as some sort of property acessor

Before I open any suggestion for my ideia in the [bind-operator](// github.com/tc39/proposal-bind-operator) proposal, I like to know you guys' opinion about, and if even it is in the scope of the current proposal. There are moments when we want to export instances methods binded with their