Le 20/12/2014 13:47, Gary Guo a écrit :
bindParameter function is not very hard to implement:
```
Function.prototype.bindParameter=function(idx, val){
var func=this;
return function(){
var arg=Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments);
arg[idx]=val;
func.apply(this,
On Mon, 22 Dec 2014 11:37:04 +0100, David Bruant bruan...@gmail.com
wrote:Function.prototype.bindParameter = function(...args){
return this.bind(undefined, ...args)
}
But this will bind all parameters. In Christian Mayer's situation, she wants
first three parameters unbound while your
if you don't need a context, you can simply use it to pass anything you
want.
as example, instead of this
On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 12:12 PM, Christian Mayer m...@christianmayer.de
wrote:
[1,2,3].forEach( myCallback, undefined, 'additionalFoo' );
you could do this:
[1,2,3].forEach( callback,
forgot squared brckets ...
myCallback.apply(nulll, [element, count, array].concat(this));
On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 1:29 PM, Andrea Giammarchi
andrea.giammar...@gmail.com wrote:
if you don't need a context, you can simply use it to pass anything you
want.
as example, instead of this
On
doesn't fat-arrow solve this? It's not that verbose, and you can put the
arguments in any order you want
```js
[1,2,3].forEach(element = myCallback(something else, element));
```
Marius Gundersen
___
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
I'm just stumbling over a little improvement (syntactic sugar) that
could help to make code a bit smaller (- less to debug, read,
understand, etc. pp.)
When you want to pass additional parameters to the Array.forEach()
callback function you currently must work with an additional (anonymous)
function(){var
arg=Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments);arg[idx]=val;
func.apply(this, arg);}}```
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2014 13:12:28 +0100
From: m...@christianmayer.de
To: es-discuss@mozilla.org
Subject: Array.forEach() et al with additional parameters
I'm just stumbling
7 matches
Mail list logo
