: Mon, December 20, 2010 11:28:15 PM
Subject: Re: Private names use cases
On 12/20/10, Allen Wirfs-Brock al...@wirfs-brock.com wrote:
I've seen mentions in the recent thread that the goal of the Private Names
proposal was to support private fields for objects. While that may be a
goal of some
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 9:21 AM, Allen Wirfs-Brock al...@wirfs-brock.comwrote:
I've seen mentions in the recent thread that the goal of the Private
Names proposal was to support private fields for objects. While that may
be a goal of some participants in the discussion, it is not what I would
See below:
On Dec 21, 2010, at 9:03 AM, Mark S. Miller wrote:
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 9:21 AM, Allen Wirfs-Brock al...@wirfs-brock.com
wrote:
I've seen mentions in the recent thread that the goal of the Private Names
proposal was to support private fields for objects. While that may be a
On Dec 21, 2010, at 12:39 PM, Mark S. Miller wrote:
The promised separate email:
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 10:20 AM, Allen Wirfs-Brock al...@wirfs-brock.com
wrote:
It seems to me, the real point of difference here is whether or not we should
add a syntactic mechanism that supports
I never said I don't want syntactic support. I said I don't like the syntax
you proposed. You and Dave have now both said that you consider this to be
the main issue.
Hm, I certainly didn't intend to say that. I'm not quite sure what you're
referring to that I said. I don't necessarily have
I've seen mentions in the recent thread that the goal of the Private Names
proposal was to support private fields for objects. While that may be a goal
of some participants in the discussion, it is not what I would state as the
goal.
I have two specific use cases in mind for private names:
1)
On 2010-12-20 17:21, Allen Wirfs-Brock wrote:
I've seen mentions in the recent thread that the goal of the Private Names
proposal was to support private fields for objects. While that may be a
goal of some participants in the discussion, it is not what I would state as
the goal.
I have
On 12/20/10, Allen Wirfs-Brock al...@wirfs-brock.com wrote:
I've seen mentions in the recent thread that the goal of the Private Names
proposal was to support private fields for objects. While that may be a
goal of some participants in the discussion, it is not what I would state as
the goal.
8 matches
Mail list logo