Re: Proposal: strict built-in functions

2019-12-09 Thread Mark S. Miller
Thanks Claude, I agree. I have added it to the agenda as well. https://github.com/tc39/agendas/blob/master/2020/02.md On Mon, Dec 9, 2019 at 12:45 AM Claude Pache wrote: > > > Le 8 déc. 2019 à 15:39, Mark S. Miller a écrit : > > Wow, Edge is definitely in violation of the intent of the spec,

Re: Proposal: strict built-in functions

2019-12-09 Thread Claude Pache
> Le 8 déc. 2019 à 15:39, Mark S. Miller a écrit : > > Wow, Edge is definitely in violation of the intent of the spec, and the > intent of the history of treatments of .caller in previous discussions and > specs over the years. The Edge behavior is grossly unsafe. > > Hi Jack, thanks for

Re: Proposal: strict built-in functions

2019-12-09 Thread Claude Pache
43, Jack Works > <mailto:zjwpe...@gmail.com>> a écrit : >> >>  >> In the current spec, strictness of the built-in functions are >> implementation-dependent behaviors. This proposal is going to fix this >> problem. >> https://github.com/Jack-Work

Re: Proposal: strict built-in functions

2019-12-08 Thread Jack Works
> > > Le 8 déc. 2019 à 14:43, Jack Works a écrit : > >  > In the current spec, strictness of the built-in functions are > implementation-dependent behaviors. This proposal is going to fix this > problem. > https://github.com/Jack-Works/proposal-strict-built-in-func

Re: Proposal: strict built-in functions

2019-12-08 Thread Claude Pache
>> Le 8 déc. 2019 à 14:43, Jack Works a écrit : >  > In the current spec, strictness of the built-in functions are > implementation-dependent behaviors. This proposal is going to fix this > problem. > https://github.com/Jack-Works/proposal-strict-built-in-functio

Re: Proposal: strict built-in functions

2019-12-08 Thread Mark S. Miller
(If it does, at least you already have a repo for it.) >> >> On Sun, Dec 8, 2019 at 08:43 Jack Works wrote: >> >>> In the current spec, strictness of the built-in functions are >>> implementation-dependent behaviors. This proposal is going to fix this

Re: Proposal: strict built-in functions

2019-12-08 Thread Jack Works
ec, strictness of the built-in functions are >> implementation-dependent behaviors. This proposal is going to fix this >> problem. >> https://github.com/Jack-Works/proposal-strict-built-in-functions >> >> ___ >> es-discuss mai

Re: Proposal: strict built-in functions

2019-12-08 Thread Isiah Meadows
:43 Jack Works wrote: > In the current spec, strictness of the built-in functions are > implementation-dependent behaviors. This proposal is going to fix this > problem. > https://github.com/Jack-Works/proposal-strict-built-in-functions > > __

Proposal: strict built-in functions

2019-12-08 Thread Jack Works
In the current spec, strictness of the built-in functions are implementation-dependent behaviors. This proposal is going to fix this problem. https://github.com/Jack-Works/proposal-strict-built-in-functions ___ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss