Le 02/04/2012 17:59, Irakli Gozalishvili a écrit :
Hi David,
Your protected work reminds me a lot of what we did with `namespcase`
module in jetpack:
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/developers/docs/sdk/latest/packages/api-utils/namespace.html
Which I also blogged about some time ago:
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 1:49 AM, David Bruant bruan...@gmail.com wrote:
Le 02/04/2012 17:59, Irakli Gozalishvili a écrit :
I remember that one of your complaints about namespaces was that inheritance
was not supported. Do you think there is a workable middleground between
namespaces and what
Le 03/04/2012 17:00, Kris Kowal a écrit :
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 1:49 AM, David Bruantbruan...@gmail.com wrote:
Le 02/04/2012 17:59, Irakli Gozalishvili a écrit :
I remember that one of your complaints about namespaces was that inheritance
was not supported. Do you think there is a workable
On Tuesday, 2012-04-03 at 01:49 , David Bruant wrote:
Le 02/04/2012 17:59, Irakli Gozalishvili a écrit :
Hi David,
Your protected work reminds me a lot of what we did with `namespcase`
module in jetpack:
Ah looks like Kris already pointed that out
Regards
--
Irakli Gozalishvili
Web: http://www.jeditoolkit.com/
On Tuesday, 2012-04-03 at 08:00 , Kris Kowal wrote:
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 1:49 AM, David Bruant bruan...@gmail.com
(mailto:bruan...@gmail.com) wrote:
Le 02/04/2012 17:59, Irakli
unsatisfied since
relying on constructor arguments while it may not be always possible to
do that.
What I describe as the protected protocol is my response to my own
challenge.
Before explaining it, I'd like to take a step back and discuss about the
object oriented properties of JavaScript.
Two
that.
What I describe as the protected protocol is my response to my own
challenge.
Before explaining it, I'd like to take a step back and discuss about the
object oriented properties of JavaScript.
Two expected properties of object-oriented languages are encapsulation
and inheritance.
Encapsulation
7 matches
Mail list logo
