Re: Is EvalError still needed?

2009-02-13 Thread Brendan Eich
09 4:58 PM To: Brendan Eich Cc: Mark S. Miller; Allen Wirfs-Brock; Chris Pine; es- disc...@mozilla.org Subject: Re: Is EvalError still needed? If we no longer throw EvalError, we should take the class out of the body of the spec too. It just clutters things up. The obvious place for such obsolete

RE: Is EvalError still needed?

2009-02-13 Thread Allen Wirfs-Brock
rfs-Brock; Chris Pine; es- >disc...@mozilla.org >Subject: Re: Is EvalError still needed? > >If we no longer throw EvalError, we should take the class out of the >body of the spec too. It just clutters things up. > >The obvious place for such obsolete things is Annex B. It contai

Re: Is EvalError still needed?

2009-02-12 Thread Waldemar Horwat
If we no longer throw EvalError, we should take the class out of the body of the spec too. It just clutters things up. The obvious place for such obsolete things is Annex B. It contains such gems as Date.getYear and octal digits in literals. Waldemar __

Re: Is EvalError still needed?

2009-02-10 Thread Brendan Eich
On Feb 10, 2009, at 7:23 PM, Mark S. Miller wrote: On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 6:42 PM, Allen Wirfs-Brock > wrote: Good, so back to the original questions. Do we remove the current permission to throw EvalError? [I vote yes] Once it's gone what do we do with the EvalError object? [I vote leave

Re: Is EvalError still needed?

2009-02-10 Thread Mark S. Miller
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 6:42 PM, Allen Wirfs-Brock < allen.wirfs-br...@microsoft.com> wrote: > Good, so back to the original questions. > > Do we remove the current permission to throw EvalError? [I vote yes] > > Once it's gone what do we do with the EvalError object? [I vote leave it in > the sp

RE: Is EvalError still needed?

2009-02-10 Thread Allen Wirfs-Brock
revious ES editions.] >-Original Message- >From: Brendan Eich [mailto:bren...@mozilla.com] >Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2009 6:33 PM >To: Allen Wirfs-Brock >Cc: Waldemar Horwat; Chris Pine; es-discuss >Subject: Re: Is EvalError still needed? > >Chris Pine an

Re: Is EvalError still needed?

2009-02-10 Thread Brendan Eich
ot;optional" feature. Allen -Original Message- From: Waldemar Horwat [mailto:walde...@google.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2009 6:19 PM To: Allen Wirfs-Brock Cc: es-discuss Subject: Re: Is EvalError still needed? Are there implementations that throw it? I thought there was at

RE: Is EvalError still needed?

2009-02-10 Thread Allen Wirfs-Brock
fs-Brock >Cc: es-discuss >Subject: Re: Is EvalError still needed? > >Are there implementations that throw it? I thought there was at least >one. > >Waldemar ___ Es-discuss mailing list Es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss

Re: Is EvalError still needed?

2009-02-10 Thread Waldemar Horwat
Are there implementations that throw it? I thought there was at least one. Waldemar ___ Es-discuss mailing list Es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss