Re: Re: Proposal: enhanced case clause

Good Idea, thank you for answer, I will do it :) 2019년 1월 20일 (일) 오후 6:01에 Isiah Meadows 님이 작성: > I'd say the best way is to just file an issue. > > - > > Isiah Meadows > cont...@isiahmeadows.com > www.isiahmeadows.com > > > On Sun, Jan 20, 2019 at 3:59 AM Sm In wrote: > >> Thank you for

Re: Re: Proposal: enhanced case clause

I'd say the best way is to just file an issue. - Isiah Meadows cont...@isiahmeadows.com www.isiahmeadows.com On Sun, Jan 20, 2019 at 3:59 AM Sm In wrote: > Thank you for answer, I've checked thart proposal before. > As I know, proposal-pattern-matching contains guards(which checkes

Re: Re: Proposal: enhanced case clause

Thank you for answer, I've checked thart proposal before. As I know, proposal-pattern-matching contains guards(which checkes value's property) Yes, this proposal's new sementic seems duplicate pattern match's guard. But, As I know, the guard can be associcated with only one pattern. here is an

Re: Proposal: enhanced case clause

Rather than investing more in switch statements, https://github.com/tc39/proposal-pattern-matching may be more compelling :-) On Sat, Jan 19, 2019 at 11:23 AM Sm In wrote: > *Before read: I'm not a native. so I may used some unnatural expression, > or non-sense sentence. I feel so sorry for