Re: Set functions

Sets already have forEach. On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 9:06 AM, Peter Jaszkowiak wrote: > There is already a proposal for this. > > On Tue, Apr 10, 2018, 10:00 Mark Miller wrote: > >> Yes, please do! >> >> >> On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 8:45 AM, Sebastian Malton

Re: Set functions

For posterity, here's the link: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-set-methods - Isiah Meadows m...@isiahmeadows.com Looking for web consulting? Or a new website? Send me an email and we can get started. www.isiahmeadows.com On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 12:06 PM, Peter Jaszkowiak

Re: Set functions

There is already a proposal for this. On Tue, Apr 10, 2018, 10:00 Mark Miller wrote: > Yes, please do! > > > On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 8:45 AM, Sebastian Malton > wrote: > >> I know that this has been brought up before but nothing seems to have >> come

Re: Set functions

Yes, please do! On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 8:45 AM, Sebastian Malton wrote: > I know that this has been brought up before but nothing seems to have come > up with it. It also has had a lot of enthusiasm about it. Would me writing > up a new proposal for adding the following

Set functions

I know that this has been brought up before but nothing seems to have come up with it. It also has had a lot of enthusiasm about it. Would me writing up a new proposal for adding the following functions to sets be useful? I would really like to see this through and would be willing to work for