yes in fact it makes sens because Set.length is the property of Set, not
necessary the length of the collection.
Thanks for your answers :)
2014-07-31 17:12 GMT+02:00 Allen Wirfs-Brock al...@wirfs-brock.com:
This was intentional
Allen
On Jul 31, 2014, at 5:24 AM, Nathan Wall
Hi everybody,
I was reading the doc for the new Set method and something suprised me :
Why Set uses the size method instead of the length property ?
--
Maxime WARNIER
___
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
Le 31/07/2014 09:25, Maxime Warnier a écrit :
Hi everybody,
I was reading the doc for the new Set method and something suprised me :
Why Set uses the size method instead of the length property ?
IIRC and with my own words length refers more to something that can be
measured contiguously (like
This was intentional
Allen
On Jul 31, 2014, at 5:24 AM, Nathan Wall ww...@google.com wrote:
Also, whether this was intentional or not, I think it's nice for objects with
`length` properties to all have properties at indices from `0` to `length`
(so they work in the `Array.prototype`
4 matches
Mail list logo