Re: Why using the size property in set

2014-08-01 Thread Maxime Warnier
yes in fact it makes sens because Set.length is the property of Set, not necessary the length of the collection. Thanks for your answers :) 2014-07-31 17:12 GMT+02:00 Allen Wirfs-Brock al...@wirfs-brock.com: This was intentional Allen On Jul 31, 2014, at 5:24 AM, Nathan Wall

Why using the size property in set

2014-07-31 Thread Maxime Warnier
Hi everybody, I was reading the doc for the new Set method and something suprised me : Why Set uses the size method instead of the length property ? -- Maxime WARNIER ___ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org

Re: Why using the size property in set

2014-07-31 Thread David Bruant
Le 31/07/2014 09:25, Maxime Warnier a écrit : Hi everybody, I was reading the doc for the new Set method and something suprised me : Why Set uses the size method instead of the length property ? IIRC and with my own words length refers more to something that can be measured contiguously (like

Re: Why using the size property in set

2014-07-31 Thread Allen Wirfs-Brock
This was intentional Allen On Jul 31, 2014, at 5:24 AM, Nathan Wall ww...@google.com wrote: Also, whether this was intentional or not, I think it's nice for objects with `length` properties to all have properties at indices from `0` to `length` (so they work in the `Array.prototype`