On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 7:52 PM, Allen Wirfs-Brock
al...@wirfs-brock.com wrote:
I don't understand what is special about the web APIs in this regard. On the
accepting side in ES we generally allow no breaking changes. Wherever there
was an existing API that accepted old-style array likes we
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Allen Wirfs-Brock
al...@wirfs-brock.com wrote:
Spread now requires an Iterable rather than an array-like
This is different from how sequenceT behaves in IDL. (It uses array-likes.) :/
--
http://annevankesteren.nl/
Anne van Kesteren wrote:
OnTue, Oct 29, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Allen Wirfs-Brock
al...@wirfs-brock.com wrote:
Spread now requires an Iterable rather than an array-like
This is different from how sequenceT behaves in IDL. (It uses array-likes.)
:/
This is more general, since array-likes
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 5:14 PM, Brendan Eich bren...@mozilla.com wrote:
Anne van Kesteren wrote:
This is different from how sequenceT behaves in IDL. (It uses
array-likes.) :/
This is more general, since array-likes should be iterable to be like
arrays, which are iterable.
So this seems
Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 5:14 PM, Brendan Eichbren...@mozilla.com wrote:
Anne van Kesteren wrote:
This is different from how sequenceT behaves in IDL. (It uses
array-likes.) :/
This is more general, since array-likes should be iterable to be like
arrays,
On 10/30/13 7:57 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Allen Wirfs-Brock
al...@wirfs-brock.com wrote:
Spread now requires an Iterable rather than an array-like
This is different from how sequenceT behaves in IDL. (It uses array-likes.) :/
We could change that if we
* are gone
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Andrea Giammarchi
andrea.giammar...@gmail.com wrote:
This is promoting a fix in the `Object.prototype` ... and since I believe
those dark days where `Object.prototype` shouldn't be touched due for/in
loops, I like it ^_^
Or maybe it's just a
On Oct 30, 2013, at 10:51 AM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
On 10/30/13 7:57 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Allen Wirfs-Brock
al...@wirfs-brock.com wrote:
Spread now requires an Iterable rather than an array-like
This is different from how sequenceT behaves in IDL.
On 10/30/13 2:28 PM, Allen Wirfs-Brock wrote:
All that is needed is to add an @@iterator method whose definition is
identical to
http://people.mozilla.org/~jorendorff/es6-draft.html#sec-array.prototype.values
Right. Pretty sure Gecko already ships just that (with a hack where we
use an
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 7:01 PM, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote:
On 10/30/13 2:28 PM, Allen Wirfs-Brock wrote:
Those are the sort of objects, that we decided to explicitly exclude
from spread and for-of.
Sure. The question is whether we can compatibly exclude them from
sequenceT in
On Oct 30, 2013, at 12:09 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 7:01 PM, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote:
On 10/30/13 2:28 PM, Allen Wirfs-Brock wrote:
Those are the sort of objects, that we decided to explicitly exclude
from spread and for-of.
Sure. The question is
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 7:23 PM, Allen Wirfs-Brock
al...@wirfs-brock.com wrote:
Doesn't really depend upon the usage. If an API is going to return a
sequenceT to JS code, it really should have an @@iterator. But that is
presumably a non-breaking change, from the JS perspective. If an API
On Oct 30, 2013, at 12:29 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 7:23 PM, Allen Wirfs-Brock
al...@wirfs-brock.com wrote:
Doesn't really depend upon the usage. If an API is going to return a
sequenceT to JS code, it really should have an @@iterator. But that is
presumably a
On 10/30/13 3:23 PM, Allen Wirfs-Brock wrote:
If an API is going to return a sequenceT to JS code
Then it becomes a JS Array object in JS. So there is no change here.
If an API wants to accept a sequenceT it only needs it to have an @@iterator
if it is actually going to use JS iterator
At: http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=harmony:specification_drafts
The HtML version isn't ready yet, but should be available soon.
Changes include:
Introduced grammar parameters and eliminated NoIn productions
Spread now requires an Iterable rather than an array-like
B.1.4, Web browser
15 matches
Mail list logo
