Re: Re: Alternative way to achieve cancelable promise

2016-10-20 Thread Kagami Rosylight
Hi Bergi: >You're not the only one who is unsatisfied with the current proposal :-) Also >have a look at Great! I’m yet to read them but I definitely will soon to discuss more. >Promises are result values that can be passed to multiple consumers, and not >every consumer should be allowed to

Re: Alternative way to achieve cancelable promise

2016-10-19 Thread Bergi
Kagami Rosylight wrote: I want to find a way to replace cancellation token in the current [stage 1 cancelable promise proposal](https://github.com/tc39/proposal-cancelable-promises) with an alternative way which does not require passing an additional parameter. You're not the only one who

RE: Alternative way to achieve cancelable promise

2016-10-18 Thread Kagami Rosylight
arately to gain attention and discuss. From: Marky Mark<mailto:m...@heyimmark.com> Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2016 11:20 AM To: Kagami Rosylight<mailto:sascha...@outlook.com>; es-discuss@mozilla.org<mailto:es-discuss@mozilla.org> Subject: Re: Alternative way to achieve cancelabl

Re: Alternative way to achieve cancelable promise

2016-10-18 Thread Marky Mark
I must admit that I do like this approach, however I'm not too familiar with the proposed spec to definitively comment on this. Have you tried proposing this in the https://github.com/tc39/proposal-cancelable-promises repository? That may be a better avenue for your suggestions. On Sat, Oct 15,