apologies
getOwnPropertyDescriptor(
source,
key
)
should have been
getOwnPropertyDescriptor(
enricher,
key
)
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 1:58 AM, Andrea Giammarchi
andrea.giammar...@gmail.com wrote:
what I've written here:
also, in case you are guessing the typo .. reacher because it could reach
more (older) engines, doing a joke with richer got it? .. too damn
fun, I know!
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 2:04 AM, Andrea Giammarchi
andrea.giammar...@gmail.com wrote:
apologies
getOwnPropertyDescriptor(
OK, maybe just code was a non-sense ...
So, the idea behind is mark a function explicitly as mixin ... how ?
Any function that is passed and has an empty prototype (then is user
defined or native) could be considered invocable as mixin.
function addFunctionality() {
this.method = function ()
right, I've simplified a lot and tested cross platform:
https://github.com/WebReflection/object-mixin#object-mixin
thoughts?
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 10:07 AM, Andrea Giammarchi
andrea.giammar...@gmail.com wrote:
OK, maybe just code was a non-sense ...
So, the idea behind is mark a
Lending my support to Object.mixin accepting a function as the argument—but
no surprise there I guess :)
Note: since functional mixins and constructors are syntactically identical
we can now get gorgeously expressive—and make type inheritance way simpler
(for the first time allowing multiple type
My previous version was doing that in a probably too smart way so I've
simplified the proposal simply accepting, in that example
Object.mixin(Thung.prototype, Thing.proottype);
Object.mixin(Thung.prototype, Thang.proottype);
It does not look so black magic anymore but it's way less ambiguous
yeah that's better - I was having a senior moment - most constructor
functions will normally reside in the prototype of course
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 1:59 PM, Andrea Giammarchi
andrea.giammar...@gmail.com wrote:
My previous version was doing that in a probably too smart way so I've
somebody already raised the concern what if I want to mixin the function
as object, not as callable
I think being [[Call]] not possible to mixin as object functionality, and
being functions all by default having ownProperties such [arguments,
name, length, caller] .. that would simply clash so
Hi, maybe one should discuss terminology first.
What has been rediscovered within the last decade every now and again by
JavaScript programming individuals, this languages capability for
functional or function based mixins, might deserve a closer look, before
running into what I would call a meta
not sure changing name is a thing to promote, it makes method name clashing
easier but it can be achieved simply attaching properties to a specific
object and then pass that as mixin ...
Object.mixin(target, {
on: source.addEventListener,
off: source.removeEventListener,
has:
updated API with Trait and the extra argument:
https://github.com/WebReflection/object-mixin#api
how does the code look like now:
https://github.com/WebReflection/object-mixin/blob/master/src/object-mixin.js
is your browser passing all tests? (if green, yes)
11 matches
Mail list logo
