Hi,
Does the order of rules means different priority? otherwise why
PropertyName is same as PrimaryName, and what is that number before
each rule means?
Regards
Eric Suen
___
Es4-discuss mailing list
Es4-discuss@mozilla.org
I agree with Lars (and Mark) on this. It would be best if access to 'this'
would throw. Throwing in the actual call to the function seems a bit harsh
since the statement that refers to 'this' might never be reached. Making
the access throw would allow people to at least catch the error and fall
Garrett Smith wrote:
Will ES4 have a simple date formatter?
___
Es4-discuss mailing list
Es4-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es4-discuss
strftime would be uber.
___
Es4-discuss
On 3/31/08 10:33 AM, Lars Hansen wrote:
I disagree that 'enum' should be reserved in ES4. E262-3 ch 16 is
explicit in allowing syntactic extensions and it appears that Opera and
Firefox do not reserve 'enum', suggesting that 'enum' is not in use on
the public web.
I don't remember why we
Date.prototype.toLocaleFormat(format) in SpiderMonkey provides access
exactly to strftime functionality.
Regards, Igor
On 31/03/2008, Carl S. Yestrau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Garrett Smith wrote:
Will ES4 have a simple date formatter?
___
On Mar 31, 2008, at 1:24 PM, Jeff Dyer wrote:
On 3/31/08 10:33 AM, Lars Hansen wrote:
I disagree that 'enum' should be reserved in ES4. E262-3 ch 16 is
explicit in allowing syntactic extensions and it appears that
Opera and
Firefox do not reserve 'enum', suggesting that 'enum' is not in
On Tue, 2008-04-01 at 00:39 +0200, Igor Bukanov wrote:
Date.prototype.toLocaleFormat(format) in SpiderMonkey provides access
exactly to strftime functionality.
As with prior discussion regarding PTC, being in SpiderMonkey is
relatively useless to those of us programming for the web.
Cheers,
2008/3/31 Nathan de Vries [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, 2008-04-01 at 00:39 +0200, Igor Bukanov wrote:
Date.prototype.toLocaleFormat(format) in SpiderMonkey provides access
exactly to strftime functionality.
As with prior discussion regarding PTC, being in SpiderMonkey is
relatively
Second that notion.
On Mar 31, 2008, at 8:24 PM, Nathan de Vries wrote:
On Mon, 2008-03-31 at 16:56 -0700, Garrett Smith wrote:
Firefox uses SpiderMonkey.
I don't get what you mean. Firefox is part of the web, but it's not
*the* web.
Without being part of a standard such as ES4, Mozilla's
- Disable FunctionObject.arguments (not actually in ES3 but
woefully used in practice)
This is an interesting one, since disallowing it would mean that
the ES3.1 and ES4 specs would have to re-allow it so that they could
explicitly disallow it :)
Yes. It's also an interesting
10 matches
Mail list logo