On Dec 13, 2007, at 11:42 PM, Lars T Hansen wrote:
I believe let function is broken in the RI (it has been in the
past).
I encouraged Michael to file a trac ticket, and he did:
http://bugs.ecmascript.org/ticket/337
Anyone else who finds an RI bug and can't see a report of it in the
Also see http://bugs.ecmascript.org/ticket/158. --lars
On Dec 14, 2007 7:42 PM, Brendan Eich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 13, 2007, at 11:42 PM, Lars T Hansen wrote:
I believe let function is broken in the RI (it has been in the past).
I encouraged Michael to file a trac ticket, and
On 14/12/2007, Michael O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So should functions be treated like var declarations or as let
declarations. Seems like they are like vars in the RI.
Is this right?
I don't see how they could be anything else for ES3 compatibility's
sake. At least, within a single
- Original Message -
From: Michael O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: es4-discuss es4-discuss@mozilla.org
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2007 7:10:41 PM (GMT-0500) America/New_York
Subject: Global functions
Are global functions declared with block or global scope. ie. declared
in the block
: Thursday, December 13, 2007 7:10:41 PM (GMT-0500) America/New_York
Subject: Global functions
Are global functions declared with block or global scope. ie. declared
in the block object or var object?
Consider:
package {
{
function fun() {
print(1
